L’autopsie de Napoléon Bonaparte. Mise au point anatomo-pathologique pour le bicentenaire de la mort de Napoléon Ier sur l’île de Sainte-Hélène en 1821
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Napoléon Bonaparte est mort le 5 mai 1821 sur l’île de Sainte-Hélène après presque six années d’exil. Le lendemain, le docteur Francesco Antommarchi, médecin corse choisi par la famille Bonaparte pour soigner l’empereur exilé, procéda à l’autopsie en présence de seize personnes, dont sept médecins britanniques. Deux cents ans après cet événement du 6 mai 1821, des mystères entourent encore la cause de la mort de Napoléon. Différentes hypothèses, telle qu’une intoxication à l’arsenic, une arythmie cardiaque ou, plus récemment, une anémie causée par une hémorragie gastro-intestinale associée à une gastrite chronique, ont été avancées dans la littérature médico-historique. Les principales raisons de tous ces débats et malentendus sont la présence de plusieurs rapports d’autopsie, de leur interprétation souvent peu scientifique, de même qu’un certain goût pour le mystère. Toutefois, d’un point de vue scientifique, la question de savoir si les rapports d’autopsie permettent vraiment de conclure quant à la cause réelle du décès se pose. Ainsi, à l’occasion du bicentenaire de la mort de Napoléon 1er à Sainte Hélène, un groupe international d’anatomo-pathologistes spécialisés en pathologie digestive s’est donné pour objectif d’analyser les rapports d’autopsie de Napoléon 1er selon leur niveau d’évidence médicale (élevé, modéré et faible). Les rapports d’autopsie de 1821 sont en faveur de l’hypothèse d’une néoplasie maligne avancée de l’estomac associée à une hémorragie gastrique comme cause immédiate de la mort de Napoléon Ier le 5 mai 1821. Napoleon Bonaparte died on 5 May 1821 on the island of St Helena after almost six years of exile. The next day, Dr Francesco Antommarchi, a Corsican doctor chosen by the Bonaparte family to treat the exiled emperor, performed the autopsy in the presence of sixteen people, including seven British doctors. Two hundred years after the event of 6 May 1821, the cause of Napoleon's death is still a mystery. Various hypotheses, such as arsenic intoxication, cardiac arrhythmia or, more recently, anaemia caused by gastrointestinal haemorrhage associated with chronic gastritis, have been put forward in the medical-historical literature. The main reasons for all these debates and misunderstandings are the presence of several autopsy reports, their often unscientific interpretation, as well as a certain taste for mystery. However, from a scientific point of view, the question arises as to whether autopsy reports are really conclusive as to the real cause of death. Thus, on the occasion of the bicentenary of Napoleon I's death in St. Helena, an international group of anatomo-pathologists specialising in digestive pathology set themselves the goal of analysing Napoleon I's autopsy reports according to their level of medical evidence (high, moderate and low). The autopsy reports of 1821 support the hypothesis of advanced malignant neoplasia of the stomach associated with gastric haemorrhage as the immediate cause of Napoleon I's death on 5 May 1821.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".