Factors Associated with Hyponatremia in Patients Newly Prescribed Citalopram: A Retrospective Observational Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyponatremia is a common and under-recognized adverse drug reaction of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants. Despite its clinical importance, there are few large-scale studies on the factors associated with hyponatremia. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of hyponatremia and to identify patient factors associated with hyponatremia in a large, population-based cohort initiating new prescriptions for citalopram. METHODS: We included all patients with a new prescription for citalopram during 2010-2017, inclusive, with baseline and post-initiation serum sodium values available. Data were obtained from an Alberta Health Pharmacy database to identify new citalopram prescriptions. Laboratory values for patients with new prescriptions were obtained from linked Calgary Laboratory Services data. Incident hyponatremia was defined as serum sodium level < 135 mmol/L, following prescription initiation. Associations were determined by performing Cox regression with time-varying covariate analysis, with the development of hyponatremia as the dependent variable. RESULTS: A total of 19,679 patients with new prescriptions were identified; 12,842 females and 6837 males. The mean age was 55.48 years (SD 21.35). Of these patients, 3250 (16.5%) developed hyponatremia, 1996 (15.5% of) females and 1254 (18.3% of) males (p = 0.002). Cox regression showed significant associations of hyponatremia with lower baseline sodium (HR 0.788), older age (HR 1.029), thiazide diuretic use (HR 1.141), and male sex (HR 1.168). Pharmaceutical manufacturer or strength of citalopram did not have significant effects on the development of hyponatremia. CONCLUSION: This study provides additional data on the predictors of hyponatremia among patients initiating citalopram therapy. We report a 16.5% incidence of hyponatremia after starting citalopram treatment, and significant new findings include a higher incidence in males. This is the first published incidence of hyponatremia following the initiation of citalopram treatment across all ages in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".