Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dams constructed on the area with high seismicity have a high-risk potential for downstream life and property. It is a wellknown fact that active faults, which are located close to dam sites, can induce inadmissible deformation in the embankment and may cause instability of the dam and foundation materials. Direct fault movement across the dam foundation can create displacements, which result to more serious problems for embankments and their appurtenant structures. Especially active faults on or near dam sites can cause severe deformation such as slumping, settlement, cracking and slope failures of the embankment. Turkey has so many dams, which are under the influence of near field motion. One of them is Kockopru dam, which has an earthfill embankment with 74-m height from foundation level, located at a distance of 4.5 km from significant faulting system in the region. This study outlines stability analyses of large embankment dams located on active seismic area, discusses the experience on behavior of large embankment dams located on or near active faults, based on analytical analyses and presents the results of the case study, including a large dam, which is very close to an active fault system. The results show that the embankment is safe for the loading of MDE and SEE condition. For SEE loading condition local sliding problem can occur on both slopes. The author suggests to use the specified response spectrum in modeling fault displacement for dynamic analyses performed by numerical methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".