MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3165371834 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2021.117

Delayed Stroke in Globus Pallidus Internus Deep Brain Stimulation

2021· letter· fr· W3165371834 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Rosalie Mercure-Cyr, Amit Persad, Aleksander Vitali

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2021
Typeletter
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanRoyal University Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep brain stimulationStimulationStroke (engine)Globus pallidusNeuroscienceContent (measure theory)MedicinePsychologyInternal medicineMathematicsPhysicsBasal gangliaParkinson's diseaseCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a common neurosurgical treatment for movement and neuropsychiatric disorders refractory to medical treatment.Common DBS targets for Parkinson's disease include subthalamic nucleus, globus pallidus pars interna (GPi), and ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus.Known complications following deep brain stimulator placement include infection, intracranial and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), system failure, seizures, stroke and, depending on the location of stimulation, cognitive, behavioral, and motor complications. 1 There are no prior reports of delayed stroke following DBS placement.A 59-year-old female was admitted for elective bilateral GPi DBS for tardive dyskinesia.She had an 8-year history of tardive dyskinesia refractory to medical management (tetrabenazine 37.5 mg PO HS).Her past medical history included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus insulin dependent, hypothyroidism, previous oral contraceptive pill-associated deep vein thrombosis, chronic pain, and anxiety.She was on rosuvastatin, clonazepam, amitriptyline, tetrabenazine, rabeprazole, metformin, jardiance, synthroid, sertraline, and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA).She underwent bilateral GPi DBS.ASA was held for 5 days pre-operatively.Stage I was done awake with some remifentanil given for positioning.The patient was not confused during any portion of the procedure.Planning was done with a pre-operative MRI.The planned trajectory did not pass through any major vascular structures or into the ventricle.We obtained O-arm spin which was merged with the pre-operative MRI and obtained coordinates for the Cosman-Roberts-Wells frame.Burr holes were done as planned, and no cortical veins were coagulated.We used three microelectrode tracts for navigation, which were adjusted by the neurophysiologist who was monitoring the recordings.We then placed the lead and confirmed positioning using intraoperative X-ray.Stage II was done under general anesthetic with precedex and remifentanil.Systolic blood pressure (SBP) remained within 105-140 mmHg, with no instability.On POD#1, she was found to have a GCS of 14.She was on 4L nasal prongs with an SBP of 96.CT showed a small IVH (Figure 1A).Her Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) declined to 12 on POD#2, and further to a GCS of 9 late in the day.She became drowsier, confused, less verbal, and developed new left-sided hemiparesis.Laboratory studies were unremarkable.Repeat CT showed bilateral caudate and right internal capsule stroke (Figure 1B).CTA showed no vascular injury or vessel occlusion.She was seen by inpatient neurology, who medically optimized her.Ultimately, she required extensive physical and occupational therapy followed by transfer to inpatient rehabilitation.She recovered well at rehab and was discharged home independently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicNeurological disorders and treatments→French-language works237,207→