MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165416416 · doi:10.1016/j.radcr.2021.04.039

Paraganglioma with highly malignant potential involving the rib - Case report and review of the literature

2021· article· en· W3165416416 on OpenAlexaff
Yong Jia, Yi Yan, Miao Lu, Iain D. C. Kirkpatrick

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology Case Reports · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
Canadian institutionsSt. Boniface HospitalUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineParagangliomaRadiologyRib cageChromogranin ABiopsyPathologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors arising from paraganglion cells in sympathetic or parasympathetic chains, which may develop in the abdomen, chest, skull base, and neck. As paragangliomas have a wide range of imaging features, the diagnosis often requires tissue sampling. We present a unique case of a paraganglioma which originally presented as a rib tumor. A 64-year-old male with right flank pain for 2 months’ was referred for a noncontrast renal colic CT. He was found to have a 3.7 × 3.5 cm soft tissue mass invading the left posterior 9th rib and paraspinal muscle. This was fluorodeoxyglucose F 18, (18F-FDG) avid, with no other distant metabolic activity. He underwent ultrasound-guided core biopsy which revealed a diagnosis of paraganglioma. A right thoracotomy with chest wall resection of 8, 9, and 10 ribs were subsequently performed. The tumor was removed along with a small portion of adherent lung. The tumor was positive for CD56, synaptophysin and chromogranin. S-100 highlighted occasional sustentacular cells, consistent with a pathologic diagnosis of a paraganglioma. The patient remains symptom free for 6 months’ after the operation. Our case highlights that, when paragangliomas occur within the chest wall, they may present as a rib tumor and can mimic metastasis, myeloma or other primary neoplastic etiologies originating from ribs. Both imaging and pathologic diagnosis can be challenging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiology Case ReportsSame topicAdrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsFrench-language works237,207