MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165424794 · doi:10.3968/12087

Translation Strategies of Scientific and Technological Texts under the Guidance of Translation Compensation Theory

2021· article· en· W3165424794 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bo Li, Hui Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueHigher education of social science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompensation (psychology)Translation (biology)Dynamic and formal equivalenceEquivalence (formal languages)Computer scienceTarget textTranslation studiesLinguisticsFunctional equivalenceScientific theoryNatural language processingArtificial intelligenceEpistemologyMachine translationPsychologyPhilosophySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the theory of translation compensation, this paper tends to explore translation strategies of scientific and technological texts, which mainly includes three parts: a brief introduction of translation compensation theory, characteristics of scientific and technological texts and compensation of sci-tech text translation both at linguistic and aesthetic terms. In this way, functional equivalence between the original and target text can be maximumly achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigher education of social scienceSame topicTranslation Studies and PracticesFrench-language works237,207