MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165467788 · doi:10.1039/d1nr02181h

Extending nanoscale patterning with multipolar surface plasmon resonances

2021· article· en· W3165467788 on OpenAlexaff
Issam Kherbouche, Danielle MacRae, Théo Geronimi Jourdain, François Lagugné‐Labarthet, Azedine Lamouri, Alexandre Chevillot Biraud, Claire Mangeney, Nordin Félidj

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersUniversité de ParisAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsNanoscopic scalePlasmonMaterials scienceExcitationNanotechnologyNanoparticleLocalized surface plasmonSurface plasmon resonanceSurface plasmonMetalOptoelectronicsPhysicsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plasmonic excitation of metallic nanoparticles can trigger chemical reactions at the nanoscale. Such optical effects can also be employed to selectively and locally graft photopolymer layers at the nanostructure surface, and, when combined with a surface functionalization agent, new pathways can be explored to modify the surface of a plasmonic nanoparticle. Among these approaches, diazonium salt chemistry is seen as an attractive strategy due to the high photoinduced reactivity of these salts. In this work, we demonstrate that it is possible to trigger the site-selective grafting of aryl films derived from diazonium salts on distinct nano-localized area of single gold nanotriangles, by taking advantage of their multipolar localized surface plasmon modes. It is shown the aryl film will preferentially graft in areas where the electric field enhancement is maximum, independently of the considered excited surface plasmon mode. These experimental findings are in very good qualitative agreement with the calculations of the local electric field, using the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. We believe that this plasmonic-based approach will not only pave a new way for the spatially controlled surface functionalization of plasmonic nanoparticles, but also provide a general strategy to attach distinct molecules to hot spot regions on a single nanoparticle, opening promising prospects in sensing and multiplexing, and optically nano-scale patterning of functional groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanoscaleSame topicGold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207