MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165482843 · doi:10.1111/epi.16952

In vivo hippocampal cornu ammonis 1–3 glutamatergic abnormalities are associated with temporal lobe epilepsy surgery outcomes

2021· article· en· W3165482843 on OpenAlexafffund
Jack Lam, Jonathan M. DuBois, Jared Rowley, Olivier Rousset, Karina A. González Otárula, Jean‐Paul Soucy, Gassan Massarweh, Jeffery A. Hall, Marie‐Christine Guiot, Maria Zimmermann, Luciano Minuzzi, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Eliane Kobayashi

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityMcGill UniversityMcGill Genome CentreMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersInstitute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and AddictionFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAmerican Epilepsy Society
KeywordsGlutamatergicTemporal lobeEpilepsyHippocampal formationEpilepsy surgeryNeuroscienceMesial temporal lobe epilepsyHippocampusIn vivoMedicinePsychologyBiologyInternal medicineGlutamate receptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective Previous positron emission tomography (PET) studies using [11C]ABP688 show reduced metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 (mGluR5) allosteric binding site availability in the epileptogenic hippocampus of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) patients. However, the link between mGluR5 abnormalities and postsurgical outcomes remains unclear. Here, we test whether reduced PET [11C]ABP688 binding in cornu ammonis (CA) sectors more vulnerable to glutamatergic excitotoxicity relates to surgical outcomes. Methods We obtained magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and [11C]ABP688‐PET from 31 unilateral MTLE patients and 30 healthy controls. MRI hippocampal subfields were segmented using FreeSurfer. To respect the lower PET special resolution, MRI‐derived anatomical subfields were combined into CA1–3, CA4/dentate gyrus, and Subiculum. Partial volume corrected [11C]ABP688 nondisplaceable binding potential (BPND) values were averaged across each subfield, and Z‐scores were calculated. Subfield [11C]ABP688‐BPND was compared between seizure‐free and non‐seizure‐free patients. In addition, we also assessed subfield volumes and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in each clinical group. Results MTLE [11C]ABP688‐BPND was reduced in ipsilateral (epileptogenic) CA1–3 and CA4/dentate‐gyrus (p < .001, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .29–.51) compared to controls, with no difference in Subiculum. [11C]ABP688‐BPND and subfield volumes were compared between seizure‐free (Engel IA, n = 13) and non‐seizure‐free patients (Engel IC–III, n = 10). In ipsilateral CA1–3 only, [11C]ABP688‐BPND was lower in seizure‐free patients than in non‐seizure‐free patients (p = .012, 95% CI = 1.46–11.0) independently of volume. A subset analysis of 12 patients with [11C]ABP688‐PET+[18F]FDG‐PET showed no between‐group significant difference in [18F]FDG uptake, whereas CA1–3 [11C]ABP688‐BPND remained significantly lower in the seven of 12 seizure‐free patients (p = .03, 95% CI = −3.13 to −.21). Significance Reduced mGluR5 allosteric site availability in hippocampal CA1–3, measured in vivo by [11C]ABP688‐PET, is associated with postsurgery seizure freedom independent of atrophy or hypometabolism. Information derived from hippocampal CA1–3 [11C]ABP688‐PET is a promising imaging biomarker potentially impactful in surgical decisions for MRI‐negative/PET‐negative MTLE patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207