MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165495690 · doi:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100029

Adherence and sustained virologic response among vulnerable people initiating an hepatitis C treatment at a nurse-led clinic: A non-experimental prospective cohort study based on clinical records

2021· article· en· W3165495690 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Myriam Gagné, Isabelle Têtu, Jean‐Pierre Grégoire, Jocelyne Moisan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Nursing Studies Advances · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsThe Quebec Population Health Research NetworkUniversité LavalMinistry of Labour, Employment and Social SolidarityUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersMerck Canada
KeywordsMedicineHepatitis CInternal medicineHepatitis C virusCohortProspective cohort studyHepatitisConfidence intervalVirusImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a need to develop specific care route for vulnerable people with hepatitis C virus. At a nurse-led clinic, we aimed to: (1) report the prevalence of patients initiating an hepatitis C treatment who (a) achieved sustained virologic response and (b) were adherent to their treatment; and (2) explore factors associated with adherence and sustained virologic response. A clinical record-based prospective cohort study. A community-based nurse-led clinic coordinating outreach services for people with hepatitis C virus in Québec City, Québec, Canada. All patients initiating an hepatitis C treatment at the nurse-led clinic from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017 (end of data collection). Patients were followed from the day they initiated their hepatitis C treatment, up to 24 weeks after the end of the treatment. Sustained virologic response was achieved if hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (RNA) was undetectable or below the lower limit of quantification at week 12 or later. Patients who reported hepatitis C treatment completion without missing any doses were considered adherent. Factors associated with adherence and sustained virologic response were identified using adjusted prevalence ratios. A total of 171 patients infected with hepatitis C virus (women: n = 51, 30%; criminal record: n = 102, 60%; substance addiction: n = 99, 58%) initiated an hepatitis C treatment at the nurse-led clinic. Overall, 126/171 (74%) patients were adherent. Patients using illicit drugs were less likely to be adherent (adjusted prevalence ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.67–0.89). Among 156/171 (91%) patients with an hepatitis C virus RNA test post-treatment, 96% (n = 149) achieved sustained virologic response. Patients who were less likely to achieve sustained virologic response were those who were non-adherent (adjusted prevalence ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.68–0.98) or who had a criminal record (adjusted prevalence ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.79–0.97). A nurse-led clinic could fill an important gap in hepatitis C health services targeted at vulnerable people in a community setting, to drive adherence and achievement of sustained virologic response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.498
Teacher spread0.427 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Nursing Studies AdvancesSame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207