Becoming a Transformative Community: Intra-Connecting the Parish Church and the Community it Serves through the Principles of Sacred Hospitality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The breakdown in relationship between rural parish churches and the wider communities in which they serve is one contributor to the high level of decline within the Anglican Church of Canada. While many emphasize that parish churches must change if they are to be relevant within their context, so too must transforming parishes retain their unique Christian identity. The issue is not if this should happen, but rather how parish leaders might encourage rural parish churches to become more open to change, without giving up their Christian identity. The purpose of this thesis was to propose revised practices that would enable rural parish churches to become more open to change and transformation so they might find ways to reconnect with the wider community in which they exist, while maintaining an authentic Christian identity. The methodology was based on Richard Osmer’s four-task hermeneutical spiral for practical theology and research. A qualitative, phenomenological approach was used to explore the clergy and lay leaders’ experiences of leadership interventions for addressing the issue of parish decline within the Stormont Deanery of the Anglican Diocese of Ottawa. Data was gathered through focus groups, semi-structured interviews, as well as parish documents detailing parish histories and community consultations. The results showed that the introduction of Sacred Hospitality principles within the life and leadership of the parish can be effective in helping parish churches become more open to change and transformation in ways that are faithful, and enable them to move towards becoming Transformative Community. Included in the final recommendations are considerations for clergy formation, pastoral and theological implications, as well as a resource for parish leaders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.041 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".