MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165530606 · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.121.035332

Applying for Junior Faculty Positions as a Research Scientist

2021· review· en· W3165530606 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sylvie Lesage, Adrian Liston

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
KeywordsSilenceMedicineLibrary scienceMedical educationArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

sponsorship: Dr Liston is supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. Dr Lesage is a Research Scholars Emeritus awardee from the Fonds de la recherche en sante du Quebec. Drs Lesage and Liston collaborate through the Medical Research Council-Canadian Institutes of Health Research joint research program. (Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Fonds de la recherche en sante du Quebec)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1560.084

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.611
GPT teacher head0.647
Teacher spread0.036 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainIncentives
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicHealth and Medical Research ImpactsFrench-language works237,207