[no title]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We construct infinite new classes of AdS<sub>4</sub>× <i>S</i><sup>1</sup>× <i>S</i><sup>5</sup> solutions of type IIB string theory which have non-trivial SL(2, ℤ) monodromy along the <i>S</i><sup>1</sup> direction. The solutions are supersymmetric and holographically dual, generically, to <i>N</i> = 1 SCFTs in <i>d</i> = 3. The solutions are first constructed as AdS<sub>4</sub>× ℝ solutions in <i>D</i> = 5 SO(6) gauged supergravity and then uplifted to <i>D</i> = 10. Unlike the known AdS<sub>4</sub>× ℝ S-fold solutions, there is no continuous symmetry associated with the ℝ direction. The solutions all arise as limiting cases of Janus solutions of d = 4, <i>N</i> = 4 SYM theory which are supported both by a different value of the coupling constant on either side of the interface, as well as by fermion and boson mass deformations. As special cases, the construction recovers three known S-fold constructions, preserving <i>N</i> = 1, 2 and 4 supersymmetry, as well as a recently constructed <i>N</i> = 1 AdS<sub>4</sub>× S<sup>1</sup>× S<sup>5</sup> solution (not S-folded). We also present some novel “one-sided Janus” solutions that are non-singular.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".