Colorectal Cancer Tissue Classification Using Semi-Supervised Hypergraph Convolutional Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of death around the globe, and therefore, the analysis of tumor micro environment in the CRC WSIs is important for the early detection of CRC. Conventional visual inspection is very time consuming and the process can undergo inaccuracies because of the subject-level assessment. Deep learning has shown promising results in medical image analysis. However, these approaches require a lot of labeling images from medical experts. In this paper, we propose a semi-supervised algorithm for CRC tissue classification. We propose to employ the hypergraph neural network to classify seven different biologically meaningful CRC tissue types. Firstly, image deep features are extracted from input patches using the pre-trained VGG19 model. The hypergraph is then constructed whereby patch-level deep features represent the vertices of hypergraph and hyperedges are assigned using pair-wise euclidean distance. The edges, vertices, and their corresponding patch-level features are passed through a feed-forward neural network to perform tissue classification in a transductive manner. Experiments are performed on an independent CRC tissue classification dataset and compared with existing state-of-the-art methods. Our results reveal that the proposed algorithm outperforms existing methods by achieving an overall accuracy of 95.46% and AvTP of 94.42%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".