MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165869049 · doi:10.1038/s41398-021-01450-3

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of minocycline on translocator protein distribution volume in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder

2021· article· en· W3165869049 on OpenAlexafffund
Sophia Attwells, Elaine Setiawan, Pablo Rusjan, Cynthia Xu, Stephen J. Kish, Neil Vasdev, Sylvain Houle, Apitharani Santhirakumar, Jeffrey H. Meyer

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Psychiatry · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCanada Research ChairsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersCIHR Skin Research Training CentreCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthGovernment of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of OntarioAzrieli Foundation
KeywordsMinocyclineTranslocator proteinGliosisPlaceboMedicineMajor depressive disorderAnterior cingulate cortexInsulaAnesthesiaInternal medicinePsychologyPharmacologyNeurosciencePathologyPsychiatryNeuroinflammationInflammationAmygdalaChemistryAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gliosis is implicated in the pathophysiology of many neuropsychiatric diseases, including treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TRD). Translocator protein total distribution volume (TSPO V T ), a brain marker mainly reflective of gliosis in disease, can be measured using positron emission tomography (PET). Minocycline reduces gliosis and translocator protein binding in rodents, but this is not established in humans. Here, the ability of oral minocycline to reduce TSPO V T was assessed in TRD. To determine whether oral minocycline, as compared to placebo, can reduce prefrontal cortex (PFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and insula TSPO V T in TRD, twenty-one TRD participants underwent two [ 18 F]FEPPA PET scans to measure TSPO V T . These were completed before and after either oral minocycline 100 mg bid or placebo which was administered in a randomized double-blinded fashion for 8 weeks. There was no significant difference between the minocycline and placebo groups on change in TSPO V T within the PFC, ACC, and insula (repeated measures ANOVA, effect of group interaction, PFC: F 1,19 = 0.28, P = 0.60; ACC: F 1,19 = 0.54, P = 0.47; insula F 1,19 = 1.6, P = 0.22). Oral minocycline had no significant effect on TSPO V T which suggests that this dosage is insufficient to reduce gliosis in TRD. To target gliosis in TRD either alternative therapeutics or intravenous formulations of minocycline should be investigated. These results also suggest that across neuropsychiatric diseases in humans, it should be assumed that oral minocycline will not reduce TSPO V T or gliosis unless empirically demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranslational PsychiatrySame topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207