MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3165933707 · doi:10.1089/end.2021.0136

Optically Tracked Needle for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Puncture: A Preliminary Report

2021· article· en· W3165933707 on OpenAlexaff
J. Michael Lazarus, Mark Asselin, Lisa Kaestner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endourology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePercutaneous nephrolithotomyLithotomy positionUltrasoundImaging phantomPercutaneous3D ultrasoundUltrasonographySurgeryRadiologyNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aim: Precise needle puncture of the renal collecting system is an essential step for effective percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The use of ultrasound for puncture is receiving increased attention. Ultrasound has recognized limitations related to poor observation of the needle tip. We aimed to assess whether an affordable open-source computerized needle navigation training system, using optically tracked ultrasonography, could improve performance of simulated PCNL puncture by urologic trainees, compared with conventional free hand manual sonographic puncture. Materials and Methods: This study describes a PCNL navigation system that can be recreated with any standard ultrasound machine using relatively inexpensive components. The system allows the needle tip to be precisely appreciated in the ultrasound image, its trajectory planned, and the appreciation of needle tip to target calix proximity sound effect. Eight participants (six trainees and two qualified urologists) assessed the PCNL training model. Alternating starting with freehand (control) and tracked needle (experimental) punctures were performed on a phantom kidney. Total procedure and the number of reinsertions required were recorded. Results: The mean time for freehand puncture was 89 seconds (range 13–173), whereas that of the optically tracked needle was 36 seconds (range 12–72). Thus, puncture time was significantly reduced by an average of 53 seconds (p = 0.045) in the experimental arm. The mean number of needle reinsertions was 3.3 with freehand compared with 1.3 in the optically tracked puncture (p = 0.005). The mean square root error of the optical tracking system was 1.8 mm (four calibrations averaged). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that affordable hardware and open-source software can be used to construct an optically tracked ultrasound navigation system for PCNL training. Statistically significant reduced puncture time and number of passes required for effective puncture are demonstrated. We feel that computerized needle tracking during PCNL puncture deserves further evaluation in a training and, potentially, in a clinical setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of EndourologySame topicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207