MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinicopathologic features of breast cancers diagnosed in females treated with prior radiation therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma: Results from a population-based cohort.

2021· article· en· W3165986417 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie M. Wong, Lissa Ajjamada, Anna Weiss, Ipshita Prakash, Sonia Skamene, Jean-François Boileau, Michaël Pollak, Mark Basik

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerOncologyLymphomaRadiation therapyInternal medicinePopulationMalignancyEpidemiologyCancerCohortChemotherapyHodgkin lymphomaGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

567 Background: Childhood and young adult survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma are at an increased risk of developing breast cancer, although little data exist on the characteristics and biologic subtype of breast cancers that develop in this high-risk population. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify all histologically confirmed breast cancers diagnosed between 1990-2016 in women treated with prior radiation therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma ≤ 30 years of age. Clinicopathologic features of subsequent breast cancers (BC-HL) were examined and compared to breast cancers diagnosed in women with no prior malignancy (BC-NPM). The association between prior chemotherapy use and biologic subtype of BC-HL was evaluated. Results: We identified 321 breast cancers diagnosed in 257 women with a history of radiation therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma. The median age at Hodgkin Lymphoma diagnosis was 22 years (range, 12-30 years), and nearly all BC-HL (97.9%) were diagnosed 8 or more years after radiation therapy. Overall, 56 (21.8%) BC-HL patients developed bilateral breast cancer, of which 28 (50%) were synchronous. When compared to women with BC-NPM, women with BC-HL were significantly younger at time of diagnosis (median age, 43 years vs. 60 years, p<0.001) and less likely to present with ductal carcinoma in situ (8.4% vs. 14.9%, p=0.001). Patients with invasive BC-HL were more likely to have high grade (43.8% vs. 32.9%, p<0.001), estrogen receptor (ER) negative breast cancer (27.7% vs. 18.2%, p<0.001), although pathologic tumor size, nodal status, and stage were not significantly different from those with BC-NPM. Compared to women with BC-NPM, the majority of operable BC-HL patients underwent surgical management with mastectomy (86.5% vs. 42.5%, p<0.001). In subset analysis of 102 women for which HER2 status was available, BC-HL were HER2+ in 18.7% of patients. Distribution of biologic subtype between BC-HL and BC-NPM are shown in the table below. In BC-HL patients, prior chemotherapy exposure was not associated with substantial differences in the proportion of ER+HER2- breast cancers (65.8% vs. 63.5%, p=0.82). Conclusions: Breast cancers in women treated with radiation therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma are characterized by earlier onset and more aggressive biologic features, although the majority remain estrogen sensitive and early stage at presentation. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the use of preventive strategies in this high-risk patient population.[Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.256
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicMultiple and Secondary Primary CancersFrench-language works237,207