MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166115564 · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2021.3088064

Magnetic-Characteristic-Free High-Speed Position-Sensorless Control of Switched Reluctance Motor Drives With Quadrature Flux Estimators

2021· article· en· W3166115564 on OpenAlexafffund
Dianxun Xiao, Jin Ye, Gaoliang Fang, Zekun Xia, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSwitched reluctance motorFlux linkageControl theory (sociology)EstimatorHarmonicsLookup tableNonlinear systemMagnetic fluxComputer sciencePhysicsRotor (electric)MathematicsDirect torque controlInduction motorVoltageMagnetic fieldArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-speed position-sensorless control of switched reluctance motor (SRM) drives is often realized by searching <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">a priori</i> flux linkage lookup table. However, obtaining the nonlinear flux linkage characteristic requires time-consuming offline measurement and occupies large memory storage. To deal with this problem, this article proposes a new position estimation scheme for SRM drives without using any magnetic characteristics. This feature is achieved by using a quadrature flux estimator (QFE) that can extract the fundamental flux and its quadrature signal from the real-time calculated flux linkage. The flux bias and flux harmonics can also be suppressed by the QFE’s adaptive bandpass capability. Therefore, the proposed method can reduce the nonlinearity in SRM flux linkage and derive simple sine–cos position signals. Afterward, the rotor position and speed can be estimated from the orthogonal flux signals using a three-phase phase-locked loop. To baseline the advantages, comparative experimental validation with the conventional method is conducted on a three-phase 12/8 SRM test bench. The results show that the proposed scheme can achieve the same estimation accuracy as the conventional method even though no magnetic characteristics are used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power ElectronicsSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207