MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3166172363 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noab090.198

EPCT-12. NATIONAL MULTICENTERED RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF DEMOGRAPHIC, TUMOUR AND INTRAOPERATIVE FEATURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF CEREBELLAR MUTISM AFTER PEDIATRIC POSTERIOR FOSSA TUMOUR RESECTION

2021· article· en· W3166172363 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michelle Kameda-Smith, Cameron Elliott, Hannna Moore, Nicholas Sader, Michael K. Tso, Mosaab Alsuwaihel, Ayoub Dakson, Olufemi Ajani, Blake Yarascavitch, Adam Fleming, Vivek Mehta, Forough Farrokhyar, Ali Yıkılmaz, Nina Stein, Sheila K. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpendymomaMedulloblastomaAstrocytomaSurgeryPilocytic astrocytomaRetrospective cohort studyHydrocephalusGlioma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Cerebellar mutism (CM) is a condition characterized by a significant lack or loss of speech in children following posterior fossa (PF) surgery. The biological origin of CM remains largely unclear and remains the subject of ongoing debate. Despite multidisciplinary rehabilitative interventions, the outcome is less favorable than initially described. Given the treatment refractory nature of CM, central to its management is prevention. Methods A national multi-centered retrospective review of all the children undergoing posterior fossa resection at 4 Canadian academic pediatric institutions was undertaken. Patient, tumour, surgical features suggested to be associated with the post-operative development of CM were reviewed to identify pre-operative and intra-operative factors that may predict post-operative CM occurrence. Results 258 pediatric patients were identified after posterior fossa lesion resection. Mean age at surgery was 6.74 years (SD 4.60) and 42.2% were female. Frozen section was available in 90.3% of cases. The majority of final tumour histology was medulloblastoma (35.7%), pilocytic astrocytoma (32.6%), ependymoma (17.1%) and exophytic glioma (1.2%). Intra-operative impression of adherence to the floor of the 4th ventricle was negative in 47.7%, positive in 36.8% of cases. The extent of resection assessed intraoperatively as gross total resection was 69.8% of cases. Intra-operative abrupt changes in blood pressure and/or heart rate was identified in 19.4% and 17.8% of cases. CM was experienced in 19.5% of patients (N=50), with the majority of cases identified by post-operative day 7. The clinical resolution of CM as mainly assessed by a neurosurgeon (86%) and was complete, significantly resolved, slight improvement, no improvement or deterioration in 56.0%, 8.0%, 20.0%, 14.0%, 2.0% respectively. Conclusion As a devastating surgical complication, identifying and understanding the biological origin of CM is the first step to complication avoidance. Maximal safe resection irrespective of intra-operative pathology remains the goal to avoid the devastating complication of CM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→