Relapse of Herpes Simplex Encephalitis by Epilepsy Surgery 35 Years after the First Infection: A Case Report and Literature Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Late relapse of herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE) is defined as the recurrence of HSE more than 3 months after the initial exposure. The postoperative diagnosis of HSE following neurosurgery is complicated because the clinical presentation can mimic other common complications of neurosurgery. Cerebrospinal fluid polymerase chain reactions (CSF-PCR) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of HSE. We describe a case of late HSE relapse after epilepsy surgery in a patient who required a brain biopsy due to repeated negative CSF-PCR results. A 38-year-old woman had a history of HSE from the age of 3 years. She had intractable epilepsy from the age of 20 years and underwent right posterior quadrant disconnection (PQD) at the age of 38 years. Postoperatively, she had a right hemispheric intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and her consciousness was gradually worsening. Her consciousness improved after removal of the ICH. However, her consciousness gradually deteriorated again. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) revealed bilateral hyperintensity in the frontal lobes, including the white matter. CSF-PCR for herpes simplex virus (HSV) was performed twice, but yielded negative results. We performed a brain biopsy to target FLAIR hyperintensity in the right frontal lobe. PCR of the brain specimen was positive for HSV. Her consciousness improved with acyclovir, methylprednisolone, and cyclophosphamide. To our knowledge, this is a case of HSE induced by epilepsy surgery which had the longest duration until relapse after the initial HSE episode. A brain biopsy can be used to confirm the diagnosis of suspected HSE when CSF-PCR results are negative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".