MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166243606 · doi:10.55016/ojs/sppp.v13i1.71388

The Canadian Northern Corridor: Planning for National Prosperity

2020· article· en· W3166243606 on OpenAlexafffundabout
G. Kent Fellows, Katharina Koch, Alaz Munzur, Robert L. Mansell, Pierre‐Gerlier Forest

Bibliographic record

VenueThe School of Public Policy Publications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCross-Border Cooperation and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersGovernment of CanadaUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsProsperityGeographyEnvironmental planningRegional sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is a follow-up to the School of Public Policy’s initial publication on the corridor concept published by Fellows and Sulzenko (2016). In it, they give a summary of the broad scope of the Canadian Northern Corridor (CNC) concept and The School of Public Policy’s CNC research program. Canada has benefited immensely from major national infrastructure projects, however; there remain significant constraints in the Canadian transportation grid that must be addressed to seize opportunities for shared prosperity and security now and into the future. Addressing these constraints requires substantive investments by the private and public sectors to grow and diversify Canada’s domestic and international markets, support northern and Indigenous community development, fulfill commitments to reconciliation, reduce environmental footprints, strengthen the national infrastructure grid, enhance northern security and sovereignty, and address barriers to inter-regional trade. Current approaches to national infrastructure planning and development are wanting, putting the achievement of these important objectives at risk. Canada’s current infrastructure approach is piecemeal; projects are planned and implemented in isolation from one another and regulatory and governance frameworks are specifically designed for individual projects and their specific purposes. This reliance on one-off projects comes with little or no consideration of a long-term national strategy or integration with other infrastructure initiatives. Project investors must address all environmental, Indigenous and intergovernmental concerns; shoulder all costs; and have the capacity to survive an uncertain approval process lasting a decade or more. Further, there is no opportunity for sharing the approval and construction costs with other infrastructure projects by integrating and coordinating their planning and implementation processes. These characteristics translate into high costs and uncertainty with the result that, increasingly, major private investors may choose to go elsewhere, taking along with them potential associated benefits. The CNC concept addresses these issues. The CNC is multi-modal, capable of accommodating infrastructure in the form of roads, rail, power lines, communications cables and transmission equipment, commodity pipelines, and other future linear infrastructure modes. The CNC involves a set of pre-approved and administered rights-of-way, combined with an institutional framework for its development and operation, improving the economics and decreasing the environmental footprint of infrastructure investments that cross regional boundaries. The establishment of a single comprehensive and integrated body for corridor regulation and operation could enhance the capacity of local communities to plan and participate in long-term infrastructure projects. Further, the CNC could deliver economic opportunities and participation for Indigenous communities. Even regions with high degrees of existing transportation infrastructure connectivity will benefit from reduced congestion and linkages to new regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe School of Public Policy PublicationsSame topicCross-Border Cooperation and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207