MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3166569903 · doi:10.1177/2050313x211025111

Complete reversibility of pembrolizumab-induced eosinophilic fasciitis without corticosteroids: A case report

2021· article· en· W3166569903 on OpenAlexaff
Liane Bourcier, Ève St‐Hilaire, Martin LeBlanc, Léo Picard

Bibliographic record

VenueSAGE Open Medical Case Reports · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
Canadian institutionsVitalité Health NetworkDr. Georges-L.-Dumont University Hospital CentreUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPembrolizumabMedicineEosinophilic fasciitisNivolumabDiscontinuationAdverse effectDermatologyInternal medicineFasciitisSurgeryImmunotherapyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy has recently started to play a fundamental role in the management of metastatic melanoma. It is however accountable for many undesirable adverse effects involving many organ systems. Eosinophilic fasciitis is a rare immune-related adverse effect associated to checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab. We report the case of a 25-year-old male who received pembrolizumab as a second-line therapy for metastatic melanoma. Approximately 8 months after starting the treatment, the patient developed signs and symptoms of eosinophilic fasciitis, including edema of his hands and lower legs, as well as joint limitation. Pembrolizumab was discontinued after 15 cycles because of symptom progression. The patient experienced complete resolution of symptoms 4 months after cessation of pembrolizumab and without corticosteroids. This case illustrates the reversibility of this immune adverse effect by discontinuation of the treatment, speculating that corticotherapy may not be needed in all cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAGE Open Medical Case ReportsSame topicEosinophilic Disorders and SyndromesFrench-language works237,207