Robust 3D-Trajectory and Time Switching Optimization for Dual-UAV-Enabled Secure Communications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates a dual-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-enabled secure communication system, in which, a UAV moves around to send confidential messages to a mobile user while another cooperative UAV transmits artificial noise signals to confuse malicious eavesdroppers. Both UAVs have energy constraints and the location information of eavesdroppers is imperfect. We consider a worst-case secrecy rate maximization problem of the mobile user over all time slots. This optimization problem is solved by jointly designing the three-dimensional (3D) trajectory of UAVs and the time allocation (recharging and service or jamming) under practical constraints including maximum UAV speed, UAV collision avoidance, UAV positioning error, and UAV energy harvesting. Specifically, we adopt a more practical UAV-ground channel model with both large-scale and small-scale fading components. Due to the non-convex feasible region constructed by the complicated constraints, directly finding the optimal solution of the original problem is intractable. To address this issue, we decouple the original optimization problem into three subproblems and develop an iterative algorithm to find its suboptimal solution by using the block coordinate descent technique. To solve each subproblem, certain advanced optimization tools, such as integer relaxation, S-procedure, and successive convex approximation techniques, are utilized. Numerical simulation results are provided to corroborate the theoretical derivations and to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm. Additionally, the numerical results assist to draw new insights on the 3D UAV trajectory by comparing the performance with conventional two-dimensional (2D) schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".