MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3166745801 · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.645765

Analysis of Two SusE-Like Enzymes From Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Reveals a Potential Degradative Capacity for This Protein Family

2021· article· en· W3166745801 on OpenAlexafffund
James Stevenson, Maria Ngo, Alicia Brandt, Joel T. Weadge, M.D.L. Suits

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Microbiology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWilfrid Laurier UniversityLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryCanadian Light Source
KeywordsBacteroides thetaiotaomicronBiologyProtein superfamilyBiochemistryGeneGeneticsComputational biologyBacteroidesBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron is a major constituent of the human gut microbiome and recognized as a prolific degrader of diverse and complex carbohydrates. This capacity is due to the large number of glycan-depolymerization and acquisition systems that are encoded by gene clusters known as polysaccharide utilization loci (PUL), with the starch utilization system (Sus) serving as the established model. Sharing features with the Sus are Sus-like systems, that require the presence of a specific membrane transporter and surface lipoprotein to be classified as Sus-like. Sus-like import loci are extremely varied with respect to any additional protein components encoded, that would effectively modify the functionality of the degradative and import action of each locus. Herein we have identified eight Sus-like systems in B. thetaiotaomicron that share the feature of a homologous SusE-like factor encoded immediately downstream from the transporter/lipoprotein duo susC/D. Two SusE-like proteins from these systems, BT2857 and BT3158, were characterized by X-ray crystallography and BT2857 was further analyzed by small-angle X-ray scattering. The SusE-like proteins were found to be composed of a conserved three domain architecture: a partially disordered N-terminal domain that is predicted to be proximal to the membrane and structurally homologous to an FN3-like bundle, a middle β-sandwich domain, and a C-terminal domain homologous to family 32 carbohydrate-binding modules, that bind to galactose. Structural comparisons of SusE with SusE-like proteins suggested only a small structural divergence has occurred. However, functional analyses with BT2857 and BT3158 revealed that the SusE-like proteins exhibited galactosidase activity with para-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside and α-(1,4)-lactose substrates, that has not been demonstrated for SusE proteins. Using a series of domain truncations of BT2857, the predominant β-D-galactosidase activity is suggested to be localized to the C-terminal DUF5126 domain that would be most distal from the outer membrane. The expanded functionality we have observed with these SusE-like proteins provides a plausible explanation of how Sus-like systems are adapted to target more diverse groups of carbohydrates, when compared to their Sus counterparts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Microbiology→Same topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research→French-language works237,207→