Stover harvest and tillage effects on corn seedling emergence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Corn ( Zea mays L.) stover is an increasingly important feedstock for biofuel and bioproduct production; however, excessive harvest of corn stover from agricultural fields may affect corn seedling emergence and subsequent plant population which may reduce corn growth and yield. Field experiments were conducted over four consecutive growing seasons in southwestern Ontario to determine under continuous corn cropping system the effects of no‐tillage (NT), conventional tillage (CT), and five rates of stover harvest (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 wt. %) on corn seedling emergence in a Harrow sandy loam and in a Brookston clay loam. Time to achieve 50% seedling emergence (t 0.5 ), emergence rate constant (k G ), and final seedling population (M G ) were adequately simulated using the Gompertz function. Irrespective of stover removal rate and soil type, t 0.5 was 2 d longer, and k G was 32% lower, under NT compared to CT. In Harrow sandy loam, stover removal from NT reduced t 0.5 in 1 out of 4 yr. The 100% removal reduced t 0.5 relative to 0, 25, 50, and 75% removal by 1.1–2.2 d in 2015. Averaged across both tillages and all removal rates, k G was greater in Harrow sandy loam than in Brookston clay loam. Stover removal rates had no effect on M G but averaged over all removal rates and soil types, M G was 9% lower for NT compared to CT in 2016. No‐tillage practice under corn production can impede seedlings emergence early in the growing season and stover removal from the field can help mitigate against this effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".