MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Microglial cell secretion of serpin‐like trypsin‐inhibitory activity: potential regulation of proteinase‐activated receptor‐2 (PAR2)‐mediated inflammatory signalling

2021· article· en· W3167010823 on OpenAlexafffund
Madeleine Renouf, Koichiro Mihara, Mahmoud Saifeddine, Morley D. Hollenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSecretionReceptorFormyl peptide receptorThrombinMolecular biologyCell biologyBiologyExtracellularChemistryBiochemistryChemotaxisImmunologyPlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microglial cells function as a relay station from the periphery to the central nervous system (CNS). In part, microglial cells signal to their microenvironment via cytokines and other agonists. We hypothesized that microglial cells can also secrete proteinases, known to signal via proteinase‐activated receptors (PARs) in the CNS. PARs, which are members of the G protein‐coupled receptor superfamily, are activated upon cleavage of their extracellular N‐terminus to unmask a tethered receptor‐activating sequence (PMID: 22453980). However, the role(s) of PARs and their activating proteinases in a microglial cell environment remains to be elucidated. Using an EOC 13.31 (ATCC® CRL‐2468) mouse neonatal‐derived microglial cell culture model (EOC cells), we evaluated the presence of functional PARs (RT‐PCR and calcium signaling assays), and their secretion of proteinases, proteinase‐inhibitors, or both. Cell‐secreted proteinase activity was assessed 1. using a microtiter plate chromogenic substrate cleavage assay and 2. a PAR cleavage assay whereby proteolysis releases an N‐terminal‐luciferase signal from an N‐Luc‐tagged PAR (PMID: 26957205). Proteinase‐inhibitory activity was monitored using the same assays by observing the ability of the EOC cell supernatants to block substrate cleavage caused by thrombin and trypsin in the microtiter plate or N‐Luc release assay. We found that the EOC cells express mRNA for PARs 1 and 2, which are known to cause inflammatory responses. However, there was no calcium response upon stimulation of either PAR by their selective peptide agonists, TFLLR‐amide and 2‐furoyl‐LIGRLO‐amide for PARs 1 and 2, respectively. PAR‐cleaving proteinase activity in the EOC cell supernatants was not detected by neither the microtiter nor the PAR N‐Luc release assay. In contrast, the EOC cell supernatants contained a serpin‐like trypsin inhibitor that blocked substrate cleavage by trypsin (but not thrombin) in both the microtiter plate and PAR2 N‐Luc release assay. Further, the EOC supernatants blocked the ability of trypsin to cleave/activate PAR2 in a target HEK cell PAR2 calcium signaling assay. We conclude that in addition to secreting cytokines and other agonists, microglial cells produce a serpin‐like trypsin inhibitor that may modulate the inflammatory activity of proteinases in the CNS microenvironment. We aim to identify the secreted trypsin inhibitor using a proteomic and activity‐based probe labelling approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→