MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Neuronal Mediators of the Frequency Increase Evoked by Activation of P2Y <sub>1</sub> Receptors in the preBötzinger Complex Inspiratory Rhythm Generating Network in Vitro

2021· article· en· W3167128720 on OpenAlexafffund
Ana Miranda Tapia, Vivian Biancardi, Robert Reklow, Wei Zhang, Vladimir Rančić, T. S. Alvares, Simon Gosgnach, Ute Krüegel, Kaiwen Kam, Silvia Pagliardini, Gregory D. Funk

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research Institute
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsGlutamatergicImmunolabelingBiologyExcitatory postsynaptic potentialGlycine receptorInhibitory postsynaptic potentialNeuroscienceMedulla oblongataMetabotropic receptorPopulationReceptorGlutamate receptorCentral nervous systemImmunologyMedicineGeneticsGlycine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ventilatory response to acute hypoxia (HVR) comprises an initial, carotid body‐mediated increase in breathing followed by a centrally‐mediated secondary respiratory depression when ventilation falls to a new steady state. Recent evidence suggests that ATP is released from astrocytes in the preBötzinger Complex (preBötC; site of inspiratory rhythm generation) during the secondary phase where it acts via P2Y 1 receptors (Rs) to excite preBötC neurons, increase breathing frequency and attenuate the secondary respiratory depression. The preBötC network comprises a heterogenous population of excitatory and inhibitory inspiratory neurons that can be further classified based on expression of transcription factors, receptors and transmitters, discharge pattern and membrane properties. An important goal is to establish the neuronal phenotype(s) that underlie the P2Y 1 R frequency increase. Perhaps surprisingly, preBötC frequency increases in response to optogenetic stimulation of excitatory OR inhibitory preBötC neurons. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine if the P2Y 1 R‐mediated frequency increase results from activation of excitatory (glutamatergic) or inhibitory (GABA/glycinergic) preBötC inspiratory neurons. Analysis of P2Y 1 R and somatostatin (SST) immunolabeling in the medulla of neonatal vGLUT2 TdTomato and GLYT2 EGFP reporter mice showed that P2Y 1 R immunolabeled neurons are concentrated in a discrete region of the ventral respiratory column (VRC) that features strong SST immunolabeling (a preBötC marker). P2Y 1 R+ neurons were sparse in all other regions of the VRC. In addition, 95% of P2Y 1 R+ neurons were glutamatergic (VGLUT2+), but <10% of glutamatergic neurons were P2Y 1 R+. None of the GLYT2+ (glycinergic) preBötC neurons were P2Y 1 R+. Whole‐cell analyses of neurons in rhythmic slices from vGLUT2 mice showed that all VGLUT2+ inspiratory preBötC neurons excited by the P2Y 1 R agonist MRS2365 (100 µM) were glutamatergic, but only1/3 of VGLUT2+ neurons were P2Y 1 R sensitive. In contrast, calcium imaging of rhythmic slices identified subpopulations (4/16) of glutamatergic and non glutamatergic inspiratory neurons that in TTX were P2Y 1 R sensitive. Finally, we demonstrated that the frequency increase evoked by MRS2365 (100 µM) in the preBötC was unaffected by block of inhibitory synaptic transmission via GABA A (bicuculline, 20 µM) and glycine (strychnine, 20 µM) receptor antagonists. In summary, we found that P2Y 1 R‐expressing neurons are concentrated in the preBötC and are primarily glutamatergic. P2Y 1 R‐sensitive neurons are primarily glutamatergic, but a subpopulation is nonglutamatergic. These data, combined with the observation that the P2Y 1 R‐evoked excitation of the preBötC does not depend on synaptic inhibition, suggest that the P2Y 1 R‐mediated excitation of the preBötC is primarily achieved through activation of excitatory, glutamatergic neurons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep→French-language works237,207→