Personal and community agency: factors associated with increased wellbeing amongst African refugee youth in Brisbane, Australia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Refugee youth face unique challenges in the resettlement context in Australia, which influence their wellbeing. Poor wellbeing affects individuals, and their family, friends, and the wider community. Little research exists on the relationship between wellbeing and the agency of African refugee youth in the resettlement process. This study examines factors associated with wellbeing to understand how refugee youth navigate resettlement through involvement in community activities. Despite the challenges of resettlement, study participants reported enhanced wellbeing because of community participation in various domains including education and community organisations. Refugee youth perceived themselves as agents of change and took ownership of their settlement journey by developing strategies to improve their own lives, while also supporting their peers. Study participants recognised the transformative role of education and the need for increased employment opportunities. To improve such outcomes, more integrated refugee resettlement approaches are required which recognise the agency of refugee youth and include them on their own terms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it