Studi Kelayakan Aerasi Bertenaga Micro Hydro Power Plant Pada Sarana Air Bersih Berkah Air Dondang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CSR PT. XYZ berencana membangun sebuah fasilitas sistem Aerasi bertenaga Micro Hydro Power Plant di lokasi Sumber Air Berkah Air Dondang. Untuk memastikan kelayakan rencana tersebut, pihak CSR PT. XYZ meminta bantuan kepada Universitas Balikpapan. Ide ini didasari oleh keinginan memanfaatkan sudut elefasi dan jarak antara dua buah kolam penampungan yang telah dibangun sebelumnya. Dalam realitanya, belum ada pengukuran teknik terhadap perencanaan tersebut. Merespon permintaan CSR PT.XYZ, Fakultas Teknologi Industri Universitas Balikpapan segera membentuk Tim untuk melakukan survey dan studi kelayakan. Berdasarkan hasil survey dan analisis Tim, rencana pembangunan fasilitas sistem aerasi bertenaga micro hydro power plant tidak direkomendasikan. Sebab, daya air terpasang lebih kecil dari daya yang dibutuhkan. Hasil survey, temuan lapangan, hasil pembahasan dan masukan alternatif telah dituangkan kedalam laporan studi kelayakan yang diserahkan kepada pihak CSR PT. XYZ selaku pemohon. Diharapkan hasil studi kelayakan ini dapat dipergunakan sebagaimana mestinya oleh pihak CSR PT. XYZ.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".