MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Myocardial blood flow during passive heat exposure in healthy young adults

2021· article· en· W3167270091 on OpenAlexafffund
Hadiatou Barry, Georgia K. Chaseling, Caroline D’Oliviera‐Sousa, François Harel, Matthieu Pelletier‐Galarneau, Daniel Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteUniversité de Montréal
FundersFondation Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal
KeywordsBlood flowMedicineMechanicsCardiologyEnvironmental sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Extreme heat events, such as heatwaves, are associated with a greater risk of cardiovascular mortality. However, the pathophysiology that links extreme heat and cardiovascular mortality remains unknown. Upon exposure to a hot environment, cardiac contractility and heart rate increase thereby presumably increasing myocardial metabolism. Although greater oxygen extraction contributes, an increase in myocardial metabolism is primarily met by greater myocardial blood flow. It is therefore conceivable that the required myocardial blood flow during heat exposure exceeds the capacity for myocardial blood flow to increase in vulnerable individuals. However, the extent to which myocardial blood flow increases during heat exposure is unknown. The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that passive heat exposure increases myocardial blood flow. METHODS Five healthy adults (31 ± 3 years, 2 women/3 men) participated in 1 experimental visit during which myocardial blood flow was measured by positron emission computed/tomography. Measurements were performed at baseline and during passive heat stress (water‐perfused suit with water at 50°C) at an increase in core (rectal) temperature of 0.5°C, 1.0°C, and 1.5°C. Heart rate and rhythm (ECG) and blood pressure (automated auscultation) were also measured. RESULTS Relative to baseline, rate pressure product was greater at an increase in rectal temperature of 0.5°C (+4165 ± 623 bpm × mmHg, p=0.01), 1.0°C (+5015 ± 519 bpm × mm Hg, p<0.01) and 1.5°C (+7516 ± 261 bpm × mm Hg, p<0.01). The increase in rate pressure product was primarily due to an increase in heart rate (p<0.01), as systolic blood pressure was not affected by heat exposure (p=0.12). Relative to baseline values, myocardial blood flow increased at an increase in rectal temperature of 0.5°C (+0.45 ± 0.09 mL/min/g, p=0.03), 1.0°C (+0.61 ± 0.06 mL/min/g, p<0.01) and 1.5°C (+1.10 ± 0.22 mL/min/g, p=0.02). Overall, myocardial blood flow increased 2.7 ± 1.0‐fold relative to baseline at an increase in rectal temperature of 1.5°C. The change in myocardial blood flow during heat exposure correlated with the change in rate pressure product (r=0.78, p<0.01). CONCLUSION These results suggest that passive heat exposure increases myocardial blood flow in proportion with the increase in rate pressure product in young healthy adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicClimate Change and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→