MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3167548404 · doi:10.21037/qims-20-1378

Predicting the histological invasiveness of pulmonary adenocarcinoma manifesting as persistent pure ground-glass nodules by ultra-high-resolution CT target scanning in the lateral or oblique body position

2021· article· en· W3167548404 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hua Ren, Fufu Liu, Lei Xu, Fan Sun, Jing Cai, Lingwei Yu, Wenbin Guan, Haibo Xiao, Huimin Li, Hong Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueQuantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsMedicineAdenocarcinomaRadiologyAtypical adenomatous hyperplasiaReceiver operating characteristicGround-glass opacityNuclear medicineLungCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (U-HRCT) has improved image quality for displaying the detailed characteristics of disease states and lung anatomy. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively examine whether U-HRCT target scanning in the lateral or oblique body position (protocol G scan) could predict histological invasiveness of pulmonary adenocarcinoma manifesting as pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs). METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2016, 260 patients with 306 pathologically confirmed pGGNs who underwent preoperative protocol G scans were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The U-HRCT findings of preinvasive lesions [atypical adenomatous hyperplasias (AAH) and adenocarcinomas in situ (AIS)] and invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas [minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIA) and invasive adenocarcinomas (IAC)] were manually compared and analyzed using orthogonal multiplanar reformation (MPR) images. The logistic regression model was established to determine variables that could predict the invasiveness of pGGNs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate their diagnostic performance. RESULTS: -292 HU, P=0.000) and greater frequencies of heterogeneity (P=0.001), air bronchogram (P=0.000), bubble lucency (P=0.000), and pleural indentation (P=0.000). Multiple logistic analysis revealed that larger diameter [odds ratio (OR), 1.328; 95% CI: 1.208-1.461; P=0.000] and higher representative attenuation (OR, 1.005; 95% CI: 1.003-1.007; P=0.000) were significant predictive factors of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas from preinvasive lesions. The optimal cut-off value of the maximum diameter for invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas was larger than 10 mm (sensitivity, 66.7%; specificity, 72.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The imaging features based on protocol G scanning can effectively help predict the histological invasiveness of pGGNs. The maximum diameter and representative attenuation are important parameters for predicting invasiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuantitative Imaging in Medicine and SurgerySame topicLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207