MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3167734456 · doi:10.1039/d1fo00693b

Structure–activity relationship of avocadyne

2021· article· en· W3167734456 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew Tcheng, Vitor L. S. Cunha, Nawaz Ahmed, Xiaofan Liu, Richard W. Smith, Kevin A. Rea, Tariq A. Akhtar, Angelo D’Alessandro, Mark D. Minden, Jerry Vockley, George A. O’Doherty, Todd L. Lowary, Paul A. Spagnuolo

Bibliographic record

VenueFood & Function · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Canadian institutionsRegional Municipality of WaterlooUniversity of WaterlooToronto Public HealthOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchCentennial CollegeIONICS Mass Spectrometry (Canada)Alberta Hospital EdmontonUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Guelph
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCancer Research Society
KeywordsAcetogeninIn vitroFatty acidChemistryIn vivoStructure–activity relationshipStereochemistryChemical structureBiochemistryBiologyOrganic chemistryGeneticsBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avocado consumption is associated with numerous health benefits. Avocadyne is a terminally unsaturated, 17-carbon long acetogenin found almost exclusively in avocados with noted anti-leukemia and anti-viral properties. In this study, specific structural features such as the terminal triple bond, odd number of carbons, and stereochemistry are shown to be critical to its ability to suppress mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation and impart selective activity in vitro and in vivo. Together, this is the first study to conduct a structure-activity analysis on avocadyne and outline the chemical moieties critical to fatty acid oxidation suppression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood & FunctionSame topicPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesFrench-language works237,207