MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3167767283 · doi:10.18410/jebmh/2021/278

Comparison of Cross Sectional Area of Posterior Tibial Nerve in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Patients with That of Healthy Controls Using High Resolution Ultrasonography - A Cross Sectional Comparative Descriptive Study from Bangalore

2021· article· en· W3167767283 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chandrashekar H.M., Sapna Mohan, Srinivas M.R

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePeripheral neuropathyCross-sectional studyTibial nervePeripheralDiabetes mellitusDiabetic neuropathyUltrasonographySurgeryInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) suffer from numbness, burning feet, lightning pain, and pins-and-needles sensations. Recently, High resolution ultrasonography is commonly used for evaluation of peripheral nerve diseases because of its easy availability, time saving and non-invasiveness of the procedure. This study intended to compare the cross sectional area (CSA) of posterior tibial nerve (PTN) in type 2 diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy with that of non-diabetic healthy adults using high resolution ultrasonography (HRU) and study the role of increase in HbA1c level and severity of DPN comparing with CSA of PTN. METHODS A cross sectional comparative descriptive study was conducted from November 2018 to May 2020 with 50 type 2 diabetic patients and 50 healthy adults. 50 type 2 diabetic patients, clinically diagnosed with DPN were analysed and using the Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (TCNS) System, the severity of neuropathy was determined. HbA1c level and other demographic data were collected. 50 healthy adults were taken as controls. The CSA of posterior tibial nerve was measured 3 cm proximal to the medial malleolus in both lower limbs using HRU. RESULTS The mean CSA of posterior tibial nerve in healthy subjects was 6.0 + / - 0.142 mm2 , and in diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy was 11.77 + / - 0.291 mm2 . Upon comparing the mean CSA of posterior tibial nerve of diabetic subjects with peripheral neuropathy and control subjects were statistically significant (P < 0.001) in unpaired ‘t’ test. In our study, CSA of the posterior tibial nerve correlated significantly with TCNS and HbA1c levels, at P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that there is a significant difference between the cross sectional areas of posterior tibial nerve in diabetic subjects with peripheral neuropathy and healthy adult subjects. HRU can detect cross sectional area changes in the posterior tibial nerve early. Thus, ultrasonography can be used as a good screening tool in these patients. KEYWORDS Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, Posterior Tibial Nerve, High Resolution Ultrasonography

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.206
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Evidence Based Medicine and HealthcareSame topicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207