MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3167872034 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-3539

A Detailed and in Situ Assessment of the Snowpack Physical Properties in a Discontinuous Humid Boreal Forest

2021· article· en· W3167872034 on OpenAlexaffabout
Benjamin Bouchard, Daniel F. Nadeau, Florent Dominé

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsTakuvik Joint International LaboratoryMakivik CorporationUniversité LavalCentrEau - Quebec Water Management Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowChemistryHydrology (agriculture)PhysicsGeologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Boreal forests occupy a large fraction of the continental surfaces and receive a lot of solid precipitation in winter. Evergreen canopies are often represented as a single and homogeneous layer in hydrological and weather forecasting models. However, in reality, boreal canopies are composed of a rather complex mosaic of trees unevenly spaced apart, with gaps of various sizes. Therefore, mass and energy inputs to the snowpack show remarkable variability at small scales resulting not only in strong spatial heterogeneity in snow depth (SD) and snow water equivalent (SWE), but also in the vertical temperature gradient in the snow column ( ). Unlike SD and SWE, has been little documented in discontinuous needleleaf forests, despite its impact on snow cover metamorphism and on a range of physical properties of snow such as density ( ), specific surface area (SSA) and effective thermal conductivity (keff). This work investigates the snowpack underneath the canopy and inside small forest gaps using continuous measurements of SD and keff and weekly snow pit surveys during winter 2018-19 in a juvenile balsam fir stand of eastern Canada (47°17’18’’N, 71°10’05’’W). This site receives an average of almost 1600 mm of precipitation annually, including 40 % falling as snow. Snow cover typically lasts over 6 months. Observations show that less snow accumulates in the subcanopy and therefore is more pronounced than inside the gaps. Moreover, and SSA are lower underneath the canopy where faceted crystals are observed. Large in that environment results in a decreasing keff over time. Overall, kinetic grain growth takes place in the subcanopy whereas settlement and isothermal conditions prevail inside the gaps. This research provides accurate observations of the snowpack in forested environments needed for a better representation of SWE, heat fluxes and ground thermal regime in hydrological and meteorological models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→