Clinical outcomes for permanent incisor luxations in a pediatric population. I. Intrusions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A longitudinal outcome study was undertaken to identify variables that significantly influenced tooth survival as well as pulpal and periodontal outcomes for intruded permanent maxillary incisors of children and adolescents. All cases were treated between June 1988 and June 1998 in a teaching hospital clinic. Clinical and radiographic data were collected for 26 patients (19 males, 7 females) that represented 31 permanent maxillary incisors. Mean age at the time of injury was 9.3 years (range = 5.5-17.8 years). Mean time elapsed to follow up was 1380 days (range = 65-3394 days). Survival analysis was used to identify variables significantly related to the survival and pulp necrosis (PN) for these incisors. Proportional hazards regression yielded significant prognostic models for tooth survival and the diagnosis of PN (P < 0.05). Incisors intruded > 6 mm had significantly decreased survival compared with incisors intruded < 3 mm (5-year survival, 0.45 and 1.0, respectively, (P < 0.05)). Complex crown fractures were significantly related to the development of PN (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that treatment method and severity of intrusion were related to the presence of replacement root resorption (P < 0.05). This study represents the largest sample of intruded permanent incisors examined in an outcome study of children and adolescents exclusively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it