MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Прототип протонного ондуляторного линейного ускорителя

2021· article· en· W3167929588 on OpenAlex
Sergey Kutsaev, Н.В. Аврелин, А.Н. Аврелин, R. Agustsson, Jonathan Edelen, A. Mypox, А.Ю. Смирнов

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueПисьма в журнал технической физики · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUndulatorPhysicsTransverse planeResonatorLinear particle acceleratorAccelerationParticle acceleratorProtonField (mathematics)MagnetOpticsBeam (structure)Computational physicsNuclear physicsClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the ways to realize undulator acceleration is to ensure particles motion in a magnetostatic undulator, where spatial oscillations of particles in the transverse direction are synchronized with temporal oscillations of transverse high-frequency field, which allows its energy transfer to the accelerated particles. The resonators, tcapable to provide a uniform transverse field, are structurally simpler than resonators with a periodically variable longitudinal field, which makes undulator accelerators an attractive alternative to coventional accelerators.Although the physics of such accelerators was previously descussed in the literature, the task of creating a physical prototype of undulator linac is still not realized. In this paper, we privde a practical description of the project of a proton undulator linear accelerator based on based on this principle, developed by RadiaBeam (USA).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it