MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168017454 · doi:10.21608/jsu.2021.172065

صعوبة التعبیر عن المشاعر(الألیکسیثمیا) وعلاقتها ببعض المتغیرات الدیموجرافیة لدى المعلمات فی مراحل التعلیم المختلفة

2021· article· ar· W3168017454 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
آیة جابر عبد العزیز, نادیة عبده أبو دنیا, وفاء محمد عبد الجواد

Bibliographic record

Venueمجلة دراسات تربوية واجتماعية · 2021
Typearticle
Languagear
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlexithymiaToronto Alexithymia ScalePsychologyArabicSignificant differenceScale (ratio)Developmental psychologyClinical psychologyStatisticsMathematicsGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

هدفت الدراسة الحالية إلى دراسة الأليکسيثميا لدى عينة من المعلمات وعلاقتها ببعض المتغيرات( التخصص، الخبرة)، واشتملت عينة الدراسة على(88) من المعلمات اللاتي يعملن في مدرسة رواد المستقبل الخاصة بمدينة (15) مايو بمحافظة القاهرة، تم تطبيق الأدوات السيکومترية التالية: -مقياس تورنتو للأليکسيثميا"البلادة الوجدانية" للمراهقين والراشدين، إعداد للعربية: علاء الدين کفافي، و فؤاد الدواش؛ وتوصلت الدراسة إلى النتائج التالية: - وجود فرق دال إحصائيًا بين متوسطات درجات المجموعات على مقياس الأليکسيثميا تُعزى إلى أثر التخصص(معلمة روضة-ابتدائي-إعدادي وثانوي)، وذلک على الأبعاد الفرعية والدرجة الکلية للمقياس، باستثناء بعد التفکير المتوجه للخارج. - لا يوجد فرق دال إحصائيا بين متوسطي درجات المعلمات على مقياس الأليکسيثميا تُعزى إلى أثر الخبرة(منخفضة-متوسطة-مرتفعة)، وذلک باستثناء بعد صعوبة تحديد الأحاسيس حيث کان هناک فرقا دالا. -لا يوجد فرق دال إحصائيا بين متوسطي درجات المعلمات على مقياس الأليکسيثميا تُعزى إلى أثر التفاعل الثنائي بين التخصص(معلمة روضة-ابتدائي-إعدادي وثانوي) والخبرة(منخفضة-متوسطة-مرتفعة)؛ حيث کانت جميع قيم ف المحسوبة غير دالة إحصائيًا. The current study aimed to study alexithymia in a sample of female teachers and its relationship to some variables (specialization, experience), and the study sample included (88) of the female teachers who work in the Pioneers of the Future School in (15) May City in Cairo Governorate, the following psychometric tools were applied: - The Toronto Scale for Alexithymia "Affective Dullness" for Adolescents and Adults, Prepared for Arabic: Aladdin Kafafi and Fouad Al-Dawash; The study found the following results: The presence of a statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the groups on the alexithymia scale due to the effect of specialization (kindergarten teacher - primary - preparatory - secondary), on the sub-dimensions and the total score of the scale, with the exception of outward-oriented thinking. - There is no statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the parameters on the alexithymia scale due to the effect of experience (low - medium - high), with the exception of the difficulty in determining the sensations where there was a significant difference. - There is no statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the female teachers on the alexithymia scale due to the effect of the bilateral interaction between specialization (kindergarten teacher - primary - preparatory - secondary) and experience (low - medium - high). Where all the computed p-values ​​were not statistically significant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1550.100

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueمجلة دراسات تربوية واجتماعيةSame topicLinguistic, Cultural, and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207