MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract GMM-027: DYNLL1 INHIBITS DNA END RESECTION IN BRCA1-DEFICIENT CELLS AND REGULATES PARP INHIBITOR SENSITIVITY

2019· article· en· W3168019520 on OpenAlexaff
Yizhou He, Khyati Meghani, Marie‐Christine Caron, Chunyu Yang, Daryl A. Ronato, Jie Bian, Anchal Sharma, Jessica K. Miller, Niraj Joshi, Alexandre Detappe, John G. Doench, Gaëlle Legube, David E. Root, Alan D. D’Andrea, Pascal Drané, Subhojyoti De, Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos, Jean‐Yves Masson, Dipanjan Chowdhury

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOlaparibCancer researchHomologous recombinationDNA repairPARP inhibitorGenome instabilityOvarian cancerCisplatinChemistryMolecular biologyGermlineOvarian carcinomaDNA damageDNAPoly ADP ribose polymeraseCancerBiologyPolymeraseGeneticsGeneChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) patients with germline mutations in BRCA1/2 exhibit high sensitivity and improved outcome to double strand DNA break (DSB)-inducing agents [i.e. platinum and Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi)] due to underlying defects in DNA repair via homologous recombination (HR). Due to their effectiveness, three PARP inhibitors (olaparib, rucaparib, niraparib) have recently gained FDA approval for the treatment of HGSOCs. However, de novo and acquired resistance to these agents is common even in the BRCA mutation carriers, and pose a significant, and unsolved, clinical challenge. Therefore, we adopted a systematic approach to comprehensibly identify unexplored factors/pathways that could be responsible for PARPi/platinum resistance in BRCA-defective HGSOC patients. Here we identify DYNLL1 as a negative regulator of DNA end resection through a loss-of-function CRISPR screen in BRCA1-mutant ovarian carcinoma cells. DNA end resection is a vital process that initiates homologous recombination (HR)-mediated repair of double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs), and consequently influences genome stability. In BRCA-defective HGSOC patients, DNA end resection is greatly compromised and contribute to the loss of HR and PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Loss of DYNLL1 allows DNA end resection and restores HR in BRCA1-mutant cells, thereby inducing resistance to platinum drugs and PARP inhibitors. In primary ovarian carcinomas low BRCA1 expression correlates with increased chromosomal aberrations, and the junction sequences of somatic structural variants indicate the loss of HR. Concurrent decrease in DYNLL1 expression in BRCA1 low ovarian cancers ‘rescued' this phenotype with reduced genomic alterations and increased homology at putative lesions. DYNLL1 limits nucleolytic degradation of DNA ends by interacting with the DNA end resection machinery (MRN complex, BLM helicase and DNA2) in cells. The impact of DYNLL1 on end resection can be re-capitulated in vitro and this is dependent on direct interaction with MRE11. In the absence of exogenous stress, depletion of DYNLL1 slows DNA replication fork progression due to ectopic activity of MRE11. Therefore, we infer that DYNLL1 is an important anti-resection factor that significantly influences genomic stability and response to DNA damaging chemotherapy. Citation Format: Yizhou Joseph He, Khyati Meghani, Marie-Christine Caron, Chunyu Yang, Daryl A. Ronato, Jie Bian, Anchal Sharma, Jessica Miller, Niraj Joshi, Alexandre Detappe, John G. Doench, Gaelle Legube, David E. Root, Alan D. D'Andrea, Pascal Drané, Subhojyoti De, Panagiotis Konstantinopoulos, Jean-Yves Masson, and Dipanjan Chowdhury. DYNLL1 INHIBITS DNA END RESECTION IN BRCA1-DEFICIENT CELLS AND REGULATES PARP INHIBITOR SENSITIVITY [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 12th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 13-15, 2018; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2019;25(22 Suppl):Abstract nr GMM-027.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.394 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207