PICU Follow-Up Clinic: Patient and Family Outcomes 2 Months After Discharge*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Hospitalization in a PICU is a life-altering experience for children and their families. Yet, little is known about the well-being of these children after their discharge. We are describing the outcome of PICU survivors at a PICU clinic 2 months after discharge. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: PICU and PICU clinic of CHU Sainte-Justine. PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study of children admitted for greater than or equal to 4 days, greater than or equal to 2 days of invasive ventilation, odds ratio greater than or equal to 4 days of noninvasive ventilation at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine. PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study of children admitted for greater than or equal to 4 days, greater than or equal to 2 days of invasive ventilation, or greater than or equal to 4 days of noninvasive ventilation at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine PICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were evaluated by a pediatric intensivist 2 months after discharge at the follow-up clinic. They were asked to fill out validated questionnaires. One hundred thirty-two patients were followed from October 2018 to September 2020. The PICU diagnoses were respiratory illness (40.9%), head trauma, and septic shock (7.6%). Average length of PICU stay was 28.5 ± 84.2 days (median 7 d). Sixty-one percent were intubated. Symptoms reported by families were as follows: fatigue (9.9%), sleep disturbances (20.5%), feeding difficulties (12.1%), and voice change and/or stridor (9.8%). Twenty-one percent of school-aged children reported school delays. Twenty-seven children demonstrated communication delays, 45% gross motor function delays, 41% fine motor delays, 37% delays in problem-solving, and 49% delays in personal-social functioning. Quality of Life scores were 78.1 ± 20.5 and 80.0 ± 17.5 for physical and psychosocial aspects, respectively. Fourteen percent of parents reported financial difficulties, 42% reported symptoms of anxiety, 29% symptoms of depression. CONCLUSIONS: PICU survivors and their families experience significant physical and psychosocial morbidities after their critical illness. PICU follow-up is crucial to determine the outcome of these children and develop interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.035 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".