Accidental degeneracy of the hydrogen atom and its non-accidental solution in parabolic coordinates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The degeneracy associated with dynamical symmetry of a potential can be identified in quantum mechanics, by solving the Schrödinger equation analytically, using the method of separation of variables in at least two different coordinate systems, and in classical mechanics by solving the Hamilton–Jacobi equation. In the present pedagogical review, the notion of separability and superintegrability of a potential, with profound implications, is discussed. In an earlier tutorial paper, we addressed the n2-fold degeneracy of the hydrogen atom using the Casimir operators corresponding to the SO(4) symmetry of the 1/r potential. The present paper is a sequel to that work, in which we solve the Schrödinger equation for the hydrogen atom using separation of variables in the parabolic coordinate systems. In doing so, we take the opportunity to revisit some excellent works on symmetry and degeneracy in classical and quantum physics, if only to draw attention to these insightful studies, which unfortunately miss even a mention in most undergraduate and even graduate level courses in quantum mechanics and atomic physics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".