MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pre-clinical evaluation of PV-10 for <i><i>in vitro</i></i> anti-tumor activity in refractory and high-risk adult solid tumors.

2021· article· en· W3168206392 on OpenAlexaff
Son Tran, Satbir Thakur, Mohit Jain, Chunfen Zhang, Aru Narendran

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMelanomaCancer researchRefractory (planetary science)In vitroCancerCytotoxic T cellMetastasisOncologyInternal medicinePathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e14544 Background: PV-10 (10% rose bengal disodium; 4,5,6,7-tetrachloro-2’,4’,5’,7’-tetraiodofluorescein) is a novel therapeutic agent previously shown to have potent anti-tumor activity following intratumoral injection in melanoma and refractory neuroblastoma, and currently is undergoing clinical testing as a single-agent for refractory metastatic neuroendocrine cancer (NCT02693067) and in combination with checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic melanoma (NCT02557321) and metastatic uveal melanoma (NCT00986661). Given the established clinical efficacy of PV-10 in adult melanoma and hepatic cancers via intratumoral injection, there is a need to evaluate the therapeutic potential of PV-10 in high-risk and refractory adult solid tumors via systemic administration. Our study aims to identify the clinical potential of systemically-delivered PV-10 by first generating prerequisite in vitro data for adult malignancies. Methods: Cytotoxicity assays were performed using the Alamar Blue assay to study the effects of PV-10 in vitro 96-hours post-treatment against a panel of adult solid tumor cell lines derived from breast (MCF-7, T-47D, MDA-MB-231), colorectal (HCT-116, LoVo, T-84), head and neck (CAL-27, Detroit-562, FaDu, UM-SCC-1), and testicular (NCC-IT, NTERA-2, TCAM-2) tissues. Light microscopy and Western blotting were used to investigate apoptosis induction and target modulation in tumor cells after PV-10 treatment. Results: In vitro results from our study demonstrate that PV-10 is cytotoxic at pharmacologically relevant concentrations across the indicated cell lines. Specifically, tumor cell lines originating from testicular tissues were highly sensitive to PV-10 treatment (Mean ± SD IC50: 37.5 ± 16.4 µM; n = 3) compared to breast (117.5 ± 71.0 µM; n = 3), colorectal (64.79 µM; n = 3), and head and neck (106.6 ± 29.2 µM; n = 4) cell lines. Western blot analyses showed dose- and time-dependent activation of pro-apoptotic protein markers in caspase-3 and PARP cleavage, indicating drug-induced apoptosis. Conclusions: This study provides the first pre-clinical results of PV-10 as a novel systemically-delivered therapeutic agent for a range of high-risk and refractory adult solid tumors. Data obtained from our in vitro experiments using a broad repertoire of cell lines that represent diverse molecular and phenotypic subtypes of solid tumors in adults can serve as prerequisite pre-clinical data to establish clinical testing in these populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.407 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207