FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF DISTAL HUMERUS FRACTURE BY PARATRICEPITAL TWO WINDOW APPROACH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background-Most of distal humerus fractures are dealt with olecranon osteotomy approach which stand as cumbersome process resulting in excessive soft tissue damage and excess hardware interposition. Alternate paratricepital two window approach has been advocated by many authors as better approach to deal with AO type A, B, and C1 type distal humerus fractures. AIM -To evaluate functional outcome of distal humerus fracture xation through paratricepital two window approach Materials & Methods – A complete of 30 patients of closed fracture distal humerus fracture underwent open fracture xation through paratricepital approach. Average age of patient was 35yr .Regular follow up and physiotherapy sessions were carried out. Average period of follow up was 12 month. Results – Out of 30 patients 28 were nally followed up till 1 year, one patient died in between while another one undergoes implant removal due to infection. From 28, 20 patients has excellent functional outcome, 3 has good, 4 has fair outcome and one patient has poor results in terms of MEPS and DASH score. Conclusion – Based on present study and data analysis we conclude that distal humerus fracture treated through paratricepital two window approach results in excellent functional outcome which is evident from ability to early start various day to day to day activities like performing st nd personal hygiene, combing hairs ,putting shirt- shoes themselves and starts eating themselves by 1 or 2 week of surgery .Unlike traditional approach like Olecranon osteotomy , it maintains adequate Tricep extensor mechanism ,does minimal soft tissue damage ,minimal post op pain ,promote early wound healing and avoid excessive hardware transposition
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".