MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Hypoxia‐Induced TIMAP Upregulation Promotes Tumor Angiogenesis by Attenuating ALK1‐Mediated TIMAP Repression

2021· article· en· W3168364297 on OpenAlexafffund
Salah Aburahess, Aashiq Hussain, Parnian Alavi, Laiji Li, Barbara J. Ballermann

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAngiogenesisWestern blotDownregulation and upregulationChemistryIn vivoHypoxia (environmental)NeovascularizationMolecular biologyCancer researchBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction TIMAP (TGF‐β1 inhibited membrane associated protein) is an endothelial cell (EC)‐predominant inhibitory protein phosphatase 1β (PP1β) regulatory subunit in the myosin phosphatase targeting (MYPT) family ( J. Biol. Chem. 2294:13280, 2019 ). TIMAP promotes proliferation and survival of EC and enhances in vitro sprouting angiogenesis ( Am. J. Physiol. ‐ Renal Physio l . 307: F623, 2014). Hypothesis Hypoxia stimulates TIMAP expression in EC, enhancing in vivo tumor angiogenesis. Methods Mammary adenocarcinoma cells (E0771, syngeneic for C57BL/6 mice) were injected into the mammary glands of five pairs of female TIMAP +/+ / TIMAP ‐/‐ C57BL/6 mice at 6‐8 weeks of age. For each pair, mice were euthanized on the day the tumor diameter exceeded 1.5 cm in one mouse. Tumor weight, mean tumor diameter, and tumor vascular density were then quantified. For quantification of vascular density, the EC markers were PECAM1 and Tie‐2 for fluorescence microscopy (IF) and western blot (WB) analysis, respectively. TIMAP +/+ mice were also exposed to progressive, chronic hypoxia by reducing the ambient O 2 concentration from 18 to 10 % over two weeks and then maintaining it at 10% for 3 weeks. Lung tissue was then evaluated for TIMAP abundance by WB analysis, and TIMAP localization was determined by IF. Finally, the mechanism regulating TIMAP expression was evaluated in cultured EC in the presence of 21% and 1% O 2 with or without TGF‐β pathway activation or inhibition. Results Tumor size was similar in TIMAP +/+ and TIMAP ‐/‐ mice through days 8‐10 after injection of E0771 cells. In 4 of 5 TIMAP ‐/‐ , but not TIMAP +/+ mice, the tumors then eroded partially through the skin and regressed gradually. At the time of euthanasia tumor size (Fig. 1A), weight (Fig. 1B) and blood vessel density (Fig.1C, D&E) were significantly lower in TIMAP ‐/‐ compared to TIMAP +/+ mice. In the chronic hypoxia model, TIMAP protein abundance in lung lysates was significantly higher in hypoxic compared to control mice, and IF using anti‐TIMAP and anti‐PECAM1 antibodies revealed that the TIMAP protein was restricted to lung EC. In cultured EC, HIF‐1α and TIMAP protein abundance were significantly higher in EC exposed to 1% than 21% O 2 , (Fig. 1F,G). The effect of 1% O 2 on TIMAP was only observed in the presence of fresh 1% serum or BMP‐9 (1‐10 ng/ml), while the hypoxia‐induced increase in HIF‐1α abundance was independent of serum or BMP‐9. In the absence of hypoxia 1% serum and BMP‐9 strongly stimulated Smad 1/5/8 but not Smad 2/3 phosphorylation and significantly reduced TIMAP protein levels. The ALK1 inhibitor K02288 but not the ALK 5 inhibitor LY‐364947 blocked 1% serum and BMP‐9 stimulated Smad 1/5/8 phosphorylation and raised the EC TIMAP abundance. Notably, hypoxia mimicked the ALK1 inhibitor, significantly blunting 1% serum and BMP‐9‐stimulated Smad 1/5/8 phosphorylation. Conclusion Hence, hypoxia induces expression of the pro‐angiogenic PP1β inhibitor TIMAP due, at least in part, to inhibition of BMP‐9/ALK1‐mediated repression of TIMAP. Furthermore, TIMAP is necessary for effective tumor angiogenesis in vivo . We therefore speculate that tumor hypoxia stimulates EC TIMAP expression by inhibiting the ALK1 pathway.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→