MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Investigating the Therapeutic Potential of Altering Drp1 Expression to Counter Sarcopenia

2021· article· en· W3168379473 on OpenAlexafffund
Maude Dulac

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMitochondrial fissionGene knockdownSarcopeniaMitochondrionMuscle atrophySkeletal muscleAtrophyBiologyCell biologyOxidative phosphorylationApoptosisEndocrinologyBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale The aging‐related loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, or sarcopenia, is a debilitating process dramatically impairing the quality of life of afflicted individuals. Although the mechanisms underlying sarcopenia are still only partly understood, impairments in mitochondrial dynamics, and notably in mitochondrial fission, have been proposed as an underlying mechanism. Importantly, conflicting data exist in the field and both excessive and insufficient mitochondrial fission were proposed to contribute to sarcopenia. Interestingly, promoting mitochondrial fission in midlife through Drp1 overexpression was recently shown to extend lifespan and attenuate several key hallmarks of muscle aging in flies. However, to date, whether modulating mitochondrial fission can impact the muscle aging process in mammals has never been investigated. Objective To define whether altering Drp1 expression in skeletal muscles of late middle‐aged mice can impact the muscle aging process. Methods Drp1 expression was knocked down or overexpressed for 4 months in the gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles of 18 months‐old C57BL/6J mice using intramuscular injections of Adeno‐Associated Viruses (AAVs). Results Drp1 knockdown in middle‐aged mice resulted in severe muscle atrophy (‐35 to 52%). Drp1 overexpression also resulted in muscle atrophy, although to a milder extend (‐9%). Drp1 knockdown resulted in reduced mitochondrial respiration coupled with an increase in mitochondrial content. Drp1 overexpression did not impact maximal mitochondrial respiration but increased the content of proteins involved in the oxidative phosphorylation, indicating altered mitochondrial quality. Neither Drp1 overexpression nor Drp1 knockdown altered mitochondrial H 2 O 2 emission. Drp1 knockdown, but not Drp1 overexpression, resulted in an increase in markers of oxidative stress, muscle degeneration and impaired autophagy. Conclusions Taken altogether, our results indicate that both overexpressing and silencing Drp1 late in life negatively impact skeletal muscles and their mitochondria. These results highlight that Drp1 content must be remain within a fairly narrow physiological range to preserve muscle and mitochondrial integrity during aging. Our results finally emphasize that altering Drp1 expression is unlikely to be a viable target to counter sarcopenia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMuscle Physiology and Disorders→French-language works237,207→