MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168415511 · doi:10.15454/dke3-br43

BELAROSA - Mise au point d’un test en routine d’identification de la sensibilité/résistance à la maladie des taches noires de variétés de rosier en vue de leur commercialisation.

2021· article· en· W3168415511 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Vanessa Soufflet‐Freslon, Caroline Bonneau, Hibrand-Saint Oyant

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPowdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistère de l'Agriculture et de l'AlimentationMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsBiologyMolecular biologyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fungus Diplocarpon rosaeis the causal agent of black spot disease on rose, a widespread and devastating disease in the outdoor landscape. In this study, a collection of 77 monoconidial fungal strains collected on cultivated roses(50 strains from Europe and Asia) and wild roses (27 strains from Kazakhstan) was established.Twostrains of D. rosaewere sequenced by using Illumina® technology. Based on nucleotide polymorphism of the two fungal strains, 27 polymorphic microsatellite markers were identified. Polymorphism analysis of the 77 strains revealed a strong genetic differentiation between strains from cultivated roses and those from wild roses. A pathogenicity assay in controlled conditions (greenhouse) was developed using 10 French fungal strains and 19 rose cultivars. Using this assay, new rose cultivars were evaluated for their resistance against these 10 fungal strains. Good correlation observed between resistance scoring in greenhouse conditions and in field indicates that pathogenicity assays in controlled conditions could be very useful in the near future to rapidly characterise the resistance of new rose varieties to black spot disease

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicPowdery Mildew Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207