MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TRPA1 channel activation with cinnamaldehyde induces cutaneous vasodilation through NOS, but not COX and KCa channel, mechanisms in human

2021· article· en· W3168473999 on OpenAlexaff
Yufuko Kataoka, Glen P. Kenny, Takeshi Nishiyasu, Tatsuro Amano, Toby Mündel, Huixin Zheng, Tze‐Huan Lei, Koichi Watanabe, Naoto Fujii

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsTransient receptor potential channelVasodilationTRPV4TRPV1ChemistryNitric oxidePharmacologyNitric oxide synthaseMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels exist in various cells and tissues including nerves and vascular endothelium. TRP channels are implicated in the regulation of several sensory organs associated with pain, pressure, and temperature. While there exists a number of TRP channels, transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) and 4 (TRPV4) channels in human skin have been shown to modulate cutaneous vasodilation (Fujii et al., 2019; Wong et. al., 2012). Transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) subtype, which belongs to the TRP channel, is thought to be activated by cold and possibly warm/hot temperatures (Wang and Siemens, 2015). Recently, we showed that TRPA1 channel activation with cinnamaldehyde induced cutaneous vasodilation in humans (Fujii et al., 2020). However, the mechanisms underlying this response remains to be determined. A previous study using mouse ear showed that nitric oxide (NO) synthase (NOS), which is a meditator of endothelium‐dependent vasodilation, can modulate the TRPA1 channel induced cutaneous vasodilation (Aubdool et al., 2016). However, it is unclear if this relationship exists in humans. Moreover, whether cyclooxygenase (COX) and Ca2+ activated K+ (KCa) channels, which are also established modulators of endothelium‐dependent vasodilation, contribute to TRPA1 channel induced cutaneous vasodilation remains to be directly assessed in humans. Based on the above, we evaluated the hypothesis that NOS, COX, and KCa channels mediate the TRPA1 channel induced cutaneous vasodilation in humans. To assess our hypothesis, cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) was assessed in 9 healthy young adults (29 ± 6 years, 4 women) at four dorsal forearm skin sites treated by intradermal microdialysis with either: 1) vehicle control (98 % propylene glycol + 0.015% lactated Ringer solution + 1.985 % dimethyl sulfoxide), 2)10 mM N(G)‐Nitro‐L‐arginine methylester, a non‐selective NOS inhibitor, 3)10 mM ketorolac, a non‐selective COX inhibitor, or 4) 50 mM tetraethylammonium, a non‐selective KCa channel blocker. Cinnamaldehyde, a TRPA1 channel activator, was administered to each skin site in a dose‐dependent manner (2.9, 8.8, 26 and 80% of cinnamaldehyde concentrations, each lasting at least 30min). Administration of ≥8.8 % cinnamaldehyde increased CVC from baseline at the vehicle control site (e.g., 27.4± 2.7 % increase in CVC, P<0.05). NOS inhibition attenuated the cinnamaldehyde induced‐cutaneous vasodilation at 2.9, 8.8, 26 and 80% concentrations relative to the vehicle control site (all P<0.05). COX inhibition and KCa channel blockade did not attenuate the cinnamaldehyde induced‐cutaneous vasodilation relative to the vehicle control site at all concentrations (all P>0.05). We conclude that in human skin in vivo, NOS plays a role in modulating the regulation of cutaneous vasodilation in response to TRPA1 channel activation with negligible contributions of COX and KCa channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207