MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Intermittent Leucine Pulses during Continuous Feeding Alters Novel Components Involved in Skeletal Muscle Growth of Neonatal Pigs

2016· article· en· W3168493028 on OpenAlexaff
Agus Suryawan, Claire Boutry, Rodrigo Manjarín, Ángela Cánovas, Alma Islas‐Trejo, Juan F. Medrano, Hanh V. Nguyen, Marta L. Fiorotto, Teresa A. Davis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsBiologySkeletal muscleAnabolismGeneLeucineInternal medicineBiochemistryEndocrinologyAmino acidMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extra‐uterine growth restriction in low‐birth‐weight (LBW) infants is associated with the development of chronic metabolic derangements, and emphasizes the need for improved nutritional protocols to optimize growth. Supplementation with intermittent pulses of leucine in continuously fed neonatal pigs enhanced skeletal muscle protein synthesis through the upregulation of mammalian target of rapamycin signaling. Piglets (n = 23, 7‐d‐old) were continuously fed a milk formula via orogastric tube for 21 d, with an additional parenteral infusion of either leucine (800 μmol·kg −1 ·h −1 , LEU) or alanine (CON) for 1 h every 4 h. To identify novel genes by which LEU may promote neonatal muscle growth, we performed RNA‐Seq analysis of longissimus dorsi muscle from 4 pigs per group, followed by gene ontology (GO) analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEG). In addition, protein abundance/activation of DEG products involved in both muscle protein anabolic or catabolic pathways was assessed by immunoblots. RNA‐Seq was performed on a HiSeq2000 sequencer analyzer. Reads were analyzed using CLCBio Genomics workbench software, assembled against the porcine reference genome, and normalized by a threshold of ‘reads per kilo base per million mapped reads’ (RPKM) ≥ 0.2. A total of 465 genes were differentially expressed between LEU and CON groups (RPKM P < 0.05). GO analyses showed developmental processes, cell junction assembly, regulation of cellular process and organ development as the terms most significantly enriched among the 465 genes. Applying more stringent parameters (RPKM P < 0.01 + >2 fold change), 18 differential expressed genes were identified between CON and LEU pigs, of which tumor necrosis factor receptor‐associated factor 6 (TRAF6) and mammalian Ste20‐like kinase 1 (MST1), both negative regulators of muscle growth, were decreased by > 2‐fold ( P < 0.01) in LEU compared to CON. Western blot analysis also showed a downregulation of MST1 and TRAF6 abundance in LEU animals ( P < 0.01) compared to CON. Together, these findings suggest that intermittent leucine pulses in continuously fed neonate pigs lead to downregulation in the gene and protein expression of signaling components that limit muscle growth. Support or Funding Information NIH AR444474, NIHHD072891, USDA NIFA 2013‐67015‐20438, and USDA/ARS 6250‐51000‐055

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMuscle metabolism and nutrition→French-language works237,207→