Antigenic Sensitivity of Membrane-Proximal Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptors can be Fine-Tuned through Hinge Truncation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) technology has revolutionized the treatment of B-cell malignancies and steady progress is being made towards CAR-immunotherapies for solid tumours. Epidermal growth factor family receptors EGFR or HER2 are commonly overexpressed in cancer and represent proven targets for CAR-T therapy; given their expression in healthy tissues it is imperative that any targeting strategy consider the potential for on-target off-tumour toxicity. Methods Herein, we utilize high-throughput CAR screening to identify novel camelid single-domain antibody CARs (sdCARs) with high EGFR-specific CAR-T response. To optimize antigenic sensitivity of this EGFR-sdCAR, we performed progressive N-terminal truncation of the human CD8 hinge domain used as a spacer in many CAR constructs. Hinge truncation resulted in decreased CAR sensitivity to EGFR and improved selectivity for EGFR-overexpressing cells over EGFR-low target cells or healthy donor derived EGFR-positive fibroblasts. To investigate the molecular mechanism of hinge truncation, we test hinge-truncated scFv-based CARs targeting membrane proximal or membrane distal domains of EGFR-family proteins, HER2 and EGFRvIII. Finally, we proceed to test hinge variant EGFR-sdCAR functionality through in vitro and in vivo assessments in primary T cells derived from multiple donors. Results For CARs targeting membrane-proximal epitopes, hinge truncation by even a single amino acid provided fine control of the antigenic sensitivity, whereas CARs targeting membrane distal domains were not sensitive to even complete hinge domain removal. Hinge-modified EGFR-sdCARs showed consistent and predictable responses in Jurkat-CAR cells and primary human CAR-T cells in vitro and in vivo . Conclusions Overall, these results indicate that membrane-proximal epitope targeting CARs can be modified through hinge length tuning for programmable antigenic sensitivity and improved tumour selectivity. Abstract Figure Single amino acid truncations of CD8-hinge domain provide precise control of CAR antigen sensitivity Truncated hinge CARs show enhanced selectivity for antigen overexpressing tumour cells and decreased activity towards healthy antigen-expressing cells Epitope location is a critical factor in determining hinge sensitivity for a CAR Hinge tuning can modulate CAR-T antigenic sensivity in vitro and in vivo
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".