Leucine Is More Readily Oxidized When Ingested as an Isolated Nutrient versus Incorporated in Its Whole-Food Matrix
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ingestion of free amino acids, or isolated sources of protein, results in faster postprandial release of dietary amino acids into circulation, which stimulates muscle protein synthesis rates. However, indirect evidence suggests that this rapid release of dietary amino acids after the ingestion of free amino acids is coupled with higher amino acid oxidation rates when compared to a whole-food source. Whole food protein results in a reduced peak amplitude and prolonged postprandial aminoacidemia. This study aimed to assess the effects of eating a whole food source of protein on the stimulation of whole-body leucine oxidation rates versus eating these same nutrients in isolated form in healthy young adults. In a crossover design, 10 recreationally active adults (24 ± 4 y; 5 M, 5 F) performed an acute bout of resistance exercise followed by the ingestion of salmon (SAL) (20.5 g protein and 7.5 g fat) or its matched constituents as crystalline amino acids and fish oil (ISO). Participants received priming doses of NaH13CO2 and L-[1–13C]leucine before initiating a constant L-[1–13C]leucine infusion. Blood and breath samples were collected at rest and after resistance exercise at regular intervals for the measurement of whole-body leucine oxidation rates and plasma leucine profiles. Data were tested using linear fixed effects models with time and group as fixed factors with Bonferroni's post hoc test. Postprandial plasma leucine concentrations did not differ between the SAL and ISO conditions (P > 0.05). Time to peak plasma leucine concentrations was faster in ISO (50 ± 27 min) vs. SAL (114 ± 64 min, P = 0.022) condition. Postprandial leucine oxidation rates were elevated from baseline at t = 30 min to t = 120 min in ISO and t = 60 min to t = 180 min in SAL (P < 0.001), with no total differences between group (P = 0.129). Time to peak leucine oxidation occurred sooner in ISO (66 ± 22 min; 1.358 ± 0.699 nmol · kg−1 · min−1) when compared to the SAL condition (105 ± 20 min; 1.067 ± 0.3076 nmol · kg−1 · min−1; P = 0.002). We show that the ingestion of a whole-food source of protein resulted in a delayed stimulation of leucine oxidation when compared to free amino acid ingestion, but a similar net increase in oxidation during the 5 h postprandial period in healthy young adults. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project 1017928
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".