MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Structural and Chemical Alterations to the Intestinal Mucus Barrier during <i>Giardia duodenalis</i> Infection

2021· article· en· W3168591382 on OpenAlexaff
Elena Fekete, Christina Amat, Thibault Allain, Koichiro Mihara, Morley D. Hollenberg, Kris Chadee, André G. Buret

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMucinMucusGiardiaProteasesMicrobiologyBiologyCysteine proteaseProteaseIntestinal mucosaEnzymeBiochemistryMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background During the course of infection with the protozoan parasite Giardia duodenalis , both mucus production and structure of the mucus layers have been shown to be altered throughout the large and small intestines. This potentially has significant impacts on mucosal barrier function, predisposing a host to mucosal inflammation, which contributes both to Giardia pathogenesis and to development of post‐infectious complications. We have attempted to characterize the mechanisms by which Giardia modulates mucus production and secretion by intestinal goblet cells, as well as chemical alterations to mucin proteins that occur in response to Giardia infection. Several effects have been found to be dependent on Giardia cysteine protease activity, suggesting a potential mechanism involving protease activated receptors. Methods The human colonic epithelial cell line LS174T was infected with Giardia trophozoites (isolates NF , WB , S2 , and GSM ). Prior to infection, trophozoites were treated with E64, a broad‐spectrum cysteine protease inhibitor, and LS174T were treated with a pepducin PAR2 antagonist, BAPTA, a calcium chelator, or U0126, an ERK1/2 inhibitor. MUC2 mucin gene expression was assessed using quantitative PCR (qPCR). Wild type (WT) and PAR2 deficient (PAR2 −/−) mice were infected with Giardia trophozoites. The colonic mucus layer was stained using WGA and qPCR was performed for Muc2 and Muc5ac in the small and large intestines. Expression of glycosyltransferase enzymes was assessed using qPCR. Results Giardia NF , S2 , and WB , but not GSM , upregulate MUC2 expression in LS174T cells. This increase was attenuated by inhibition of Giardia cysteine proteases and by antagonism of PAR2 or inhibition of calcium release or ERK1/2 signaling in LS174T cells. Giardia infected WT mice show increased Muc2 and Muc5ac expression in the colon, and increased Muc5ac but decreased Muc2 expression in the jejunum. These changes were not seen in PAR2−/− mice. Both WT infected and PAR2−/− non‐infected mice showed thinning of the colonic mucus layer compared to WT controls. There was some recovery in thickness in PAR2−/− infected mice. Expression of the fucosyltransferase Fut2 was increased in the jejunums of WT mice, while the sulfotransferase Chst4 was decreased. Expression of the glycan core synthase C2GnT1 was increased in the WT jejunum, while C1GalT1 expression was slightly decreased in the jejunum and colon. Conclusions Giardia ‐induced alterations to mucin gene expression in vitro and in vivo are dependent on PAR2 signaling. Canonical PAR2 signaling, characterized by calcium release and ERK1/2 pathway activation, contribute to altered expression of the MUC2 mucin in colonic goblet cell cultures. Expression of several glycosyltransferases, responsible for the addition of glycan groups to intestinal mucins, are altered during Giardia infection in vivo , suggesting mucosal alterations may involve chemical modifications of mucin proteins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicParasitic Infections and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207