MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The in vitro transport kinetics of organic anion transporter 1 (OAT1) are influenced by Na‐dependent dicarboxylate cotransporter 3 (NaDC3)

2013· article· en· W3168593717 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan M. Pelis, Yohannes Hagos, Leslie Ingraham

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrganic anion transporter 1ProbenecidCotransporterIn vitroChinese hamster ovary cellChemistryIn vivoPharmacologySymporterBiochemistryTransporterBiologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In vitro studies that assess OAT1 activity study the protein in isolation, despite its reliance on NaDC3. The purpose was to determine if NaDC3 can influence OAT1 activity in typical in vitro assays used during the course of drug development. The uptake of [ 3 H]para‐aminohippurate was determined in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing OAT1 (CHO‐OAT1) and CHO‐OAT1 cells transiently transfected with NaDC3. The uptake of PAH was stimulated 2‐fold in the presence versus absence of NaDC3. The NaDC3 inhibitor lithium (2 mM) had little to no effect on OAT1‐mediated PAH transport. The maximal rate of OAT1‐mediated PAH transport increased 3.6‐fold in the presence of NaDC3 (16 vs. 57 pmol/mg protein/min). There was a modest increase in the Michaelis constant associated with PAH transport (0.72 vs. 1.5 μM). The inhibitory potential of probenecid was not affected by co‐expression of NaDC3 (IC50: 4.5 vs. 4.6 μM). In vitro studies with OAT1 should consider examining its activity in the presence of NaDC3. This may be particularly important when using OAT1 kinetic data for in vitro in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE). Funding: NSERC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→